The German Economic Machine, and Its Implications for America

26 January 2012 - 10:00am

Frugality, a lack of debt, and a government focused on high production, low inflation and extensive social services are the secrets to providing many Germans with a standard of living higher than Americans making twice as much.

Don Lee profiles a Germany whose economic strengths are based on principles that America once enjoyed, and seems largely to have lost.

"Germany's economy looks like that of the U.S. a generation ago. In 1975, manufacturing accounted for about 20% of the United States' economic output, or gross domestic product, about the same as in Germany today. Since then, U.S. manufacturing's share of GDP has slid to about 12%.

In 1975, the U.S. budget deficit was a manageable 1% of the economy, about the same as Germany's now. Last year, the U.S. deficit was about 10%.

American families in the 1970s and early '80s typically saved about 10% of their take-home pay, about the same as in Germany today. The U.S. savings rate these days is in the low single digits."

Source: Los Angeles Times, January 21, 2012

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

German and American Work Time

There is also a striking difference between German and American work time:

The average German worker works 82% as many hours per year as the average American worker.

All full-time workers in Germany are guaranteed at least 4 weeks paid vacation. Over one-quarter of American full-time workers have no paid vacation, and those who do average just a bit over one week per year.

Full-time German employees have the right to shift to part-time work with the same hourly earnings. Part-time workers are protected from discrimination.

Charles Siegel

Bookmark and Share
What the Census will not include is the long-form questions that have, since 1940, asked one-sixth of American households to reveal fine details about their lives. The long form was scrapped following the 2000 Census, so planners who are accustomed to relying on detailed, nuanced Census data to analyze and plan their communities may not get the detail that they expect.