NJ Governor's ARC Tunnel Plug-Pull Can Lead to Better Plan

Ostensibly, the actions today by NJ Governor Chris Christie to cancel the "Access to Region's Core" (ARC) tunnel project seem like a vicious blow to the future of rail in our country (fatal even, given the recent commentary from conservatives country-wide on opposition to the national high speed rail network projects).  I myself am extremely disappointed that our state's fiscal circumstances have led the Governor to make this decision, and I am sincerely empathetic to the construction and operational jobs and potential to improve mobility conditions that this cancellation jeopardizes.

4 minute read

October 7, 2010, 7:37 PM PDT

By Ian Sacs


Ostensibly, the actions today by NJ Governor Chris Christie to cancel the "Access to Region's Core" (ARC) tunnel project seem like a vicious blow to the future of rail in our country (fatal even, given the recent commentary from conservatives country-wide on opposition to the national high speed rail network projects).  I myself am extremely disappointed that our state's fiscal circumstances have led the Governor to make this decision, and I am sincerely empathetic to the construction and operational jobs and potential to improve mobility conditions that this cancellation jeopardizes.

But alas, I am also an optimist.  I believe that despite the skip-in-step this may give to rail naysayers, there is no real case here against the importance of improved rail connectivity, neither here in New Jersey nor across the country.  I believe that the fundamental objectives and benefits of the ARC project are not lost on the Governor.  I believe that the choice made today is entirely about budget prudence (and perhaps a little message about the smell of pay-to-play in New Jersey), and since New Jersey's flailing budget and treacherously-close-to-skyrocketing taxes impact everyone who lives here - not just those who need improved rail transport - the state's bottom line must be prioritized.  In other words, the Governor did not unilaterally ax rail, or the prospect of a High Speed Rail nation, or the alternative transportation philosophy, he merely axed a project that was clearly threatening to overrun in the order of billions ($1,000,000,000+) of dollars which must, as I understand it, come from New Jersey taxpayers' pockets*. 

So let's all try to ignore the circumstantial spin by auto-centric thinkers still bumbling about federal buildings elated that this action spells r-o-u-t for the stupid choo-choo-train antics of the past two years.  Perhaps from a national perspective it has that taint, but locally the focus is squarely on fiscal prudence, and deep down we should all be able to acknowledge that.  Anyone who has watched Governor Christie over this year knows that he certainly isn't risking accusation of being soft; we're witnessing an unmitigated, rather severe lesson about staying on budget, keeping pencils sharp, and right-sizing**.

The way forward is not about death to the concept of rail connectivity between New Jersey and New York City, and it's certainly not about death to rail nationwide.  I believe the way forward is about - under a more careful budgetary eye - re-thinking the need, and re-thinking the solution.  And believe me, there are many alternative solutions that are just as clever - if not more so - than what was under construction.  Case in point, highly respected transportation advocate and President of Institute for Rational Urban Mobility (IRUM), George Haikalis, has offered his "Hoboken Alternative" as a more cost effective and practical solution, even testifying about it to the New Jersey Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee earlier this year.  That proposal capitalized on an already bustling intermodal facility and existing right-of-way.  Certainly this and many other excellent ideas exist for consideration and debate; undoubtedly one is the basis of what can literally fit the bill.

In conclusion, regardless of how the media portray this for headline impact (kibosh/kill/dead), it's not over if we don't want it to be over; and the fact that Governor Christie is meeting with Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood tomorrow is a hopeful sign that neither of those two people likely want this to be over.  I am optimistic, as ever, that although the ARC project would have been a great boon for transit riders regionally and transit advocates nationally, there is still a feasible and perhaps better future connectivity solution to be found and built.  One would think that the Governor yearns for success as much in engineering a better solution to an immensely critical mobility challenge as he does in budgetary prudence.  We shall see.


*There is one speculative strategy possibly at play here of which I feel obliged to proffer.  Governor Christie, in light of severe project cost overruns handed to him, a severe state budget quagmire taken on by him, a severe approach to all things not fiscally prudent inherent by him, and a severe affection for this project by the USDOT known to him, may be attempting to bluff the Feds into either sharing in or taking on the likely overruns.  Secretary LaHood was clearly nonplussed with the Governor's actions today and I submit their meeting tomorrow can go one of three ways: 1. Help us pay for this project you want so much.  2. Let's talk about an entirely different way to get this done without running up another couple of billions 3. We're broke; I'm cutting my losses, Sir.  If either of the first two occur, Governor Christie gets two feathers in his cap.  If the third occurs, it's a political wash.  Win for budget hawk supporters, loss for the millions who are yearning for a better way to get across the Hudson.  Personally, I like Option 2!

**Oh, how I LOVE when I get to use three horrid clichés straight in a row; that's win-win-win, baby!


Ian Sacs

Ian Sacs has been playing in traffic for over ten years. He solves challenging urban transportation and parking problems by making the best possible use of precious public spaces and designing custom-fit programs to distribute modal demand.

Sweeping view of Portland, Oregon with Mt. Hood in background against sunset sky.

Oregon Passes Exemption to Urban Growth Boundary

Cities have a one-time chance to acquire new land for development in a bid to increase housing supply and affordability.

March 12, 2024 - Housing Wire

Aerial view of green roofs with plants in Sydney, Australia.

Where Urban Design Is Headed in 2024

A forecast of likely trends in urban design and architecture.

March 10, 2024 - Daily Journal of Commerce

Cobblestone street with streetcar line, row of vintage streetlights on left, and colorful restaurant and shop awnings on right on River Street in Savannah, Georgia.

Savannah: A City of Planning Contrasts

From a human-scales, plaza-anchored grid to suburban sprawl, the oldest planned city in the United States has seen wildly different development patterns.

March 12, 2024 - Strong Towns

Aerial View of Chuckanut Drive and the Blanchard Bridge in the Skagit Valley.

Washington Tribes Receive Resilience Funding

The 28 grants support projects including relocation efforts as coastal communities face the growing impacts of climate change.

March 18 - The Seattle Times

Historic buildings in downtown Los Angeles with large "Pan American Lofts" sign on side of building.

Adaptive Reuse Bills Introduced in California Assembly

The legislation would expand eligibility for economic incentives and let cities loosen regulations to allow for more building conversions.

March 18 - Beverly Press

View from above of swan-shaped paddleboats with lights on around artesian fountain in Echo Park Lake with downtown Los Angeles skylien in background at twilight.

LA's Top Parks, Ranked

TimeOut just released its list of the top 26 parks in the L.A. area, which is home to some of the best green spaces around.

March 18 - TimeOut

News from HUD User

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Call for Speakers

Mpact Transit + Community

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Write for Planetizen

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.