Sprawl Isn't Only In The Eye Of The Beholder

26 July 2001 - 9:00am

Columnist Daniel Weintraub recounts Sacramento State public policy professor Rob Wassmer's criticisms of a recent Brookings Institution study on sprawl in the U.S.

The Brookings study found that fast growing Western cities had less sprawl than cities elsewhere in the country, based on lower average population densities in metropolitan areas. Wassmer argues that density alone is an insufficient measurement of sprawl. Working as a consultant for the California Senate Office of Research, Wassmer studied business, growth and development patterns over time to develop a sprawl scorecard for California cities. His analyses focused on changes in central areas relative to entire regions. This method found that San Jose, often cited as example of sprawling growth, has retained population and retail sales in its central areas, though it lost farmland. Weintraub suggests that Wassmer's method may provide a more accurate measure of sprawl for California cities and provide a better picture of growth patterns over time than the Brookings Institution findings.

Source: The Sacramento Bee, October 7, 2005
Bookmark and Share
New Suburbanism is not a new design paradigm that seeks to compete with or discredit principles of New Urbanism. Instead, our perspective represents a broad-based attempt to find the best, most practical ways to develop and redevelop suburban communities.