California Should Alter Its HSR Plans to Save Money

Thomas Elias argues that California's HSR plans should be altered to reduce costs and avoid some urban municipalities against the plans. This would reduce the $25 billion funding gap and allow construction to move ahead.

Elias thinks "anyone who thinks building a 238-mph rail system between San Diego and San Francisco will come in at or under budget is probably hallucinating." Instead, California should construct as much HSR track as it can while keeping costs low and then running the trains through urban areas like Orange County and the South Bay at slower speeds on existing track. He believes that total journey times will only be increased by around 45 minutes, but California could replace these inner city portions of the route at a later date.

Full Story: Time to Change the Map on High Speed Rail

Comments

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Red necktie with map of Boston

Tie one on to celebrate your city

Choose from over 20 styles of neckties imprinted with detailed city or transit maps.
$44.95
Book cover of Unsprawl

Unsprawl: Remixing Spaces as Places

Explore visionary, controversial and ultimately successful strategies for building people-centered places.
Starting at $12.95