Do California's Environmental Regulations Harm Business, or Drive Innovation?

3 March 2010 - 2:00pm

Bill Fulton takes a rational approach to determining whether California's strict environmental regulations are a burdensome expense to business or if they drive them to innovate and succeed.

Fulton's conclusion? New laws like AB 811 do clean up the environment without putting undue burden on business by giving incentives and creating assessment districts.

Fulton writes, "A smokestack or an HVAC system will be replaced sooner or later — but if the private market is left to its own devices, these new capital investments may be no greener or efficient than the old ones. An aggressive regulation can force technological innovation by requiring that new capital investments, in fact, be greener than old ones. Oftentimes, however, that's not enough because the payback period on green capital investments can be so long. Low-cost financing programs — from the government or water purveyors or electrical utilities — may also be necessary to bridge the gap."

Source: Governing Magazine, March 3, 2010

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Enviro regs and funding needed

Enviro. regs are needed to protect public and environmental health. However, businesses that cannot afford to make enviro. improvements and reach compliance should be assisted financially.

Bookmark and Share
Every dollar spent on new and wider highways is a dollar taken from taxpayers, and every inch of right-of-way that Big Brother takes is an inch taken from landowners.