Do California's Environmental Regulations Harm Business, or Drive Innovation?
Bill Fulton takes a rational approach to determining whether California's strict environmental regulations are a burdensome expense to business or if they drive them to innovate and succeed.
Fulton's conclusion? New laws like AB 811 do clean up the environment without putting undue burden on business by giving incentives and creating assessment districts.
Fulton writes, "A smokestack or an HVAC system will be replaced sooner or later — but if the private market is left to its own devices, these new capital investments may be no greener or efficient than the old ones. An aggressive regulation can force technological innovation by requiring that new capital investments, in fact, be greener than old ones. Oftentimes, however, that's not enough because the payback period on green capital investments can be so long. Low-cost financing programs — from the government or water purveyors or electrical utilities — may also be necessary to bridge the gap."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- L.A. River: From Afterthought to Asset - Jan 11, 2012
- Redevelopment Project Sweeps The Bay Area - Nov 29, 2011
- CEQA Lawsuit Delays Another Streetscape Improvement - Nov 23, 2011
- Beach Cities Changing Tide Toward a Healthy Future - Oct 05, 2011
- Does CEQA Reform Leverage the Environment for Jobs? - Oct 05, 2011


















Enviro regs and funding needed
Enviro. regs are needed to protect public and environmental health. However, businesses that cannot afford to make enviro. improvements and reach compliance should be assisted financially.