Filling in the City

18 December 2009 - 5:00am

As climate talks start and stop in Copenhagen, Anthony Flint argues for local action by affecting the built environment. He calls for more infill redevelopment, saying "we need more city".

"Well-designed, walkable, mixed-use, transit-oriented development is more important than all the hybrid taxis and green roofs the city could require.

The urban fabric is a key weapon against climate change. Cities allow us to walk, ride a bike, and take transit. “Growing Cooler,’’ a study by SmartGrowth America and the Urban Land Institute, showed that compact development - basically, being able to live, work, and shop within a 20-minute radius - can reduce vehicle miles traveled by as much as 30 percent. There is still much empirical analysis to be done on the relationship between the built environment and greenhouse gas emissions, but walking to the corner store for a gallon of milk is one of the greenest contributions any of us can make."

Source: The Boston Globe, December 17, 2009

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

We need less mass produced building

I don't think we need more city per-say. We need less mass produced building. Rather than accept rampant subdivision building as inevitable, our federal and state governments should be dictating that quality, small-scale, sustainble building be required.

Co-housing and village design, including eco-villages, offer walkable communities that aren't particularly urban. Cities aren't for everyone and rural living should not be shunted for urban.

Bookmark and Share
All of that only scratches the surface of what's wrong with this study. The idea that complex urban development patterns and human behavior can be meaningfully studied according to one primary criteria — density — is wrong from the start.