'A Palace for the Age of Towering Debt and Easy Credit'
Los Angeles Times architecture critic Christopher Hawthorne offers a take on Las Vegas' new CityCenter mega project, highlighting the project's faux-urbanism and what in the end is disappointingly conservative architecture.
"If CityCenter represents a final bender for Wall Street's decade of unreason -- and since this after all is Las Vegas -- it might at least have pursued a wilder, more inventive and more entertaining kind of architectural gigantism. Given MGM’s declarations all along that this was going to be the first truly high-design development on the Strip, it’s tough not to wander through the place and think – even if it’s purely an architecture-lover’s fantasy -- about what might have been if a really rip-roaring group of firms, one with a collective taste for scale, color, irony and abandon, had been allowed to drain that $8.5 billion budget."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Libeskind Says Downturn is Right Time for Mega Projects - Dec 17, 2009
- Mega Development or Mega Disappointment? - Jun 17, 2010
- Last Gasp for Vegas? - Nov 27, 2009
- Branding Sustainability - Oct 14, 2008
- Zappos Founder "Trades Shoes for Urban Planning" - Jan 23, 2012


















Las Vegas And The Avant Garde
This critic doesn't recognize the irony in what he is saying. He is a admirer of avant-gardist architecture, but he admits that avant-gardist architecture is really Las-Vegas style sensationalism:
"since this after all is Las Vegas -- it might at least have pursued a wilder, more inventive and more entertaining kind of architectural gigantism."
Charles Siegel