Are Cities Abusing The Power Of Eminent Domain?
2 June 2001 - 10:00am
In this op-ed, the author wonders if our forefather's definition of "public use" included casinos, auto plants, shopping malls and health clubs.
"It's a quaint old document, but occasionally we still refer to it. The U.S. Constitution says, for example, that private property cannot "be taken for public use without just compensation." Maybe the Founders believed that "public use" included casinos, auto plants, shopping malls and health clubs, but if so they left no record of it. Maybe they believed a city should be able to condemn a restaurant so that a private developer could build high-priced housing near an art museum, but it's not very likely."
Full Story:
Your land -- until some city wants it
Source:
The Rocky Mountain News, June 1, 2001
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- NYT Editorial Blasts House Transportation Bill - Feb 10, 2012
- House and Senate Transportation Bills on a Collision Course - Feb 08, 2012
- The Obama Administration's Crusade for Homeowners - Feb 07, 2012
- A Federal Assault on Transit - Feb 06, 2012
- A Shift of Attention to Local Planning Policies by the Tea Party Becomes National News - Feb 06, 2012
“
Its very unsuitability for an urban center justifies its current usage as a suburban or ex-urban pattern.
”


















