This year is the centennial of Daniel Burnham's Plan of Chicago, a landmark in the world of urban planning. Martha Frish has had the pleasure of looking through Burnham's handwritten documents and shares some of his wisdom that didn't make it into the final plan.
Daniel H. Burnham and Edward H. Bennett published The Plan of Chicago on July 4th, 1909, under the auspices of The Commercial Club of Chicago. In 2004, the Plan of Chicago Centennial Committee was established to begin to think about how best to commemorate the publication of this seminal document. To build upon several years of planning by the Committee, The Burnham Plan Centennial Committee was convened by a group of business and civic leaders in late 2006.
The Burnham Plan Centennial Program Partners eventually included 223 organizations, institutions and entities throughout the Chicago metropolitan region who have been engaged in opportunities to inspire the region's leaders, communities and institutions to build on the Burnham Plan and act boldly to shape the future of the Chicago region during 2009. During the October 2008 – October 2009 year, the Committee has coordinated hundreds of programs and learning resources consistent with its "Bold Plans. Big Dreams" theme.
Much of the year's discussion about the plan has focused on Burnham's ideas for improving Chicago's physical attributes and infrastructure – what Carol Coletta, President of CEO's for Cities, has called "the big, muscular thing," the theoretical and practical reasons for building transportation systems, parks, boulevards, parkways and cultural and civic institutions, as opposed to addressing something modest such as 'happiness.'
Burnham's handwritten drafts for the plan are housed in the Ryerson and Burnham Libraries at the Art Institute of Chicago, and research into the texts of the four unpublished drafts of the Plan has continued. A remarkable number of passages in the drafts of the plan contain Burnham's passionate commentary on potential mechanisms for the promotion of a sense of citizenship. These comments tend not to emphasize infrastructure, but they have a strong philosophical component - and they were omitted from the published version.
Burnham himself began Chapter 1 of one of the drafts by writing, "Chicago repeats the history of all great cities in that its location was due to convenience, and its growth has been the result of commerce." This may be universally true, but it is now time that his comments about promoting cheerfulness, conditions conducive to strengthening body and mind, and citizenship – qualities that might today come under the heading of "quality of life" – should receive equal attention in modern society. They may seem amorphous, or mere common sense - but American urban history has demonstrated that "the training of a child toward good citizen-ship" in the playground has not yet been given the scholarly and professional attention these comments deserve.
As a start, there is a significant pedagogical opportunity in including the Plan in various college and graduate school curricula, and connecting it to the physical and sociological attributes of Chicago – and other cities - then and now. The Plan of Chicago and its drafts may be used as a basis for student papers on specific aspects of history and geography; architectural and urban history; urban planning and public policy. Teaching students to think comprehensively and ambitiously about how they can "create better surroundings" is a prime example of connecting coursework to students' real lives, and is, after all, the underlying assumption behind the field of urban planning.
Martha Frish, AICP is an instructor at The School Of The Art Institute Of Chicago, and currently a a lecturer at DePaul University in conjunction with The Burnham Plan Centennial.