New London, Four Years After Kelo
The 2005 Supreme Court decision on Kelo v. New London was a landmark in eminent domain law, paving the way for Pfizer to develop there. Four years later, Pfizer is pulling up stakes.
The City of New London won its Supreme Court battle against residents in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood of New London: the Court ruled that municipalities can use eminent domain to take private land and give it to another private entity for economic development. But it hardly seems like a win today as the Fort Trumbull neighborhood is filled with barren lots and the private developer - Pfizer - has decided to leave New London.
An editorial in the Hartford Courant sees a silver lining:
"Pfizer will leave behind prime space that should attract the kind of taxpaying tenant New London badly needs. And the adjoining Fort Trumbull neighborhood of modest homes taken by eminent domain and torn down to make way for an upscale urban village — and to entice Pfizer to the site — is now ready for just that kind of development, once the economy recovers."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- New London's Big Gamble and Big Loss - Jan 04, 2010
- Inspiration for Kelo Case Leaves Town - Nov 15, 2009
- How NYC was Zoned...and Rezoned - Jan 05, 2012
- For Urbanizing Beijing, "Putting Farmers in Flats" Not Enough - Dec 24, 2011
- How Planning is Like Growing Tomatoes - Dec 15, 2011


















Overturn Kelo vs. New London
Talk about a supreme court ruling that needs to be overturned- Kelo vs. New London. There are many states that have not passed laws protecting their communities from the practice that took place in New London. Be careful.