Make No Big Plans
Salon's Michael Lind argues that attempts to create "comprehensive reform" of anything is a recipe for disaster.
Since the post-Robert Moses era, urban planners have realized the perils of implementing sweeping, comprehensive plans. Michael Lind argues that the government -- in the middle of large reform programs for health care, the economy, energy, etc. -- should take note:
"Advocates of comprehensive reform often claim that you can't solve one problem in isolation. For example, supporters of comprehensive immigration reform argued that you can't have workplace enforcement and border security without a simultaneous amnesty, because that would create a pool of unemployed illegal immigrants trapped north of the newly controlled U.S.-Mexican border. Similarly, many supporters of comprehensive energy reform argue that you can't have more private R&D for clean energy without simultaneously stimulating demand by means of subsidies to clean energy industries. This is the Fallacy of Holism -- you can't fix anything unless you fix everything at once."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- NYT Editorial Blasts House Transportation Bill - Feb 10, 2012
- House and Senate Transportation Bills on a Collision Course - Feb 08, 2012
- The Obama Administration's Crusade for Homeowners - Feb 07, 2012
- A Federal Assault on Transit - Feb 06, 2012
- A Shift of Attention to Local Planning Policies by the Tea Party Becomes National News - Feb 06, 2012


















