The Blow-By-Blow at the Senate Banking Committee
8 July 2009 - 2:00pm
The committee convened a hearing on Monday on green investments in public transportation, and Streetsblog got the scoop. It was 4 against 1 as witnesses sided against Randal O'Toole and his anti-transit arguments.
"O'Toole aside, the witnesses largely agreed in their recommendations: New transit investments are absolutely necessary for economic and environmental reasons, but most of the benefits from such investments will be missed without tight integration between transportation investment and land use planning.
It was a message almost perfectly tailored to rebut O'Toole before he ever spoke."
Full Story:
The Imminent Irrelevance of Randal O’Toole
Source:
Streetsblog, July 7, 2009
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- NYT Editorial Blasts House Transportation Bill - Feb 10, 2012
- Does Gentrification Need to be a Bad Word? - Dec 28, 2011
- Congressional Transportation Committee Debates CA High Speed Rail - Dec 18, 2011
- Washington DC Imagines Itself Without Transit - Dec 12, 2011
- Occupy D.C.'s Urban Design Model - Nov 11, 2011
“
There are limits to the amount of pollution the environment can absorb without reducing ecosystem services and impairing both human health and the sustainability of our economy.
”


















