Highway Teardowns Benefitting Traffic Flow and City Life
8 July 2009 - 8:00am
The Infrastructurist offers four case studies of cities that have removed highways. The result: less congestion.
"Of course, improving congestion is not the main reason why a city would want to knock down a poorly planned highway–the reasons for that are plentiful, and might include improving citizen health, restoring the local environment, and energizing the regional economy. More efficient traffic flow is just a wonderful side benefit.
Sound dubious? Here are several examples of how three cities (and their drivers) have fared better after highways that should never have been built in the first place were taken down."
In each of these cases, the removed highways have been replaced with new public spaces and parks.
Full Story:
Huh?! 4 Cases Of How Tearing Down A Highway Can Relieve Traffic Jams (And Save Your City)
Source:
The Infrastructurist, July 6, 2009
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- A Neighborhood of Stairs - Jun 22, 2011
- Six Trending Urbanist Themes for the New Year - Dec 31, 2011
- Potholes as Parks? - Dec 17, 2011
- How Planning is Like Growing Tomatoes - Dec 15, 2011
- Public Parks to Cover Highways in Hamburg - Dec 09, 2011
“
Officials in South Africa understand the potential risks they've brought upon themselves. They've seen abandoned Olympic venues blight Athens. They know that even Beijing has had trouble luring events to its infamous Bird's Nest stadium. But South Africa remains hopeful.
”



















Very nice.
Almost makes me wish that Winnipeg had some freeways to tear down!
...almost.