Back-To-Nature Plans Stall Innovation
According to this op-ed, allowing cities to de-densify undermines the importance of the city's role in society at large--namely, as a breeding ground for technological and cultural innovation.
"The Obama administration is reportedly considering backing a radical plan to shrink deteriorating American cities by bulldozing entire neighborhoods and returning the land to nature. The idea, which originated in Flint, Mich. -- cratered by the auto industry implosion -- is to persuade disintegrating and depopulated cities to embrace their shrinkage, destroy abandoned infrastructure, save money and thereby stave off fiscal ruin.
The plan makes sense on some level, but it's disturbing on another. Anyone who's driven by miles of empty lots in Detroit knows that urban demolition does more than destroy blight. It also erases history and what a city was. Traces of the past have always been jumping-off places for the next chapter (think rehabbed Victorians or sleek post-industrial lofts). And, of course, the back-to-nature plan -- which could be used in cities such as Memphis, Baltimore, Philadelphia and others -- is fundamentally an admission and may be an assurance that these cities will never rise again."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Transportation Planning In Federal Climate Legislation - Oct 30, 2009
- Areas Near Grand Canyon Approved for Mining - May 08, 2009
- Plea for Preservation - Apr 29, 2009
- A Better Transit-Oriented Design - Feb 26, 2009
- National Heritage Areas In Center of Property Rights Debate - Dec 10, 2007


















De-densify?
Bulldozing neighborhoods of empty lots and reducing city limits will increase most measures of density not decrease them. The numerators (population/occupied units) have been decreasing; it may be time to decrease the denominators (urban area/land open to development) as well.