Reinventing America's Cities: Discovering Opportunities by Challenging Biases

Dr. Aseem Inam takes writers on urbanism and architecture to task for spreading stereotypes about "third world cities", particularly when used to generalize about urban form.
Photo: Aseem Inam

The current economic crisis, increasing ecological concerns, and growing urban populations are remarkable opportunities for innovative thinking and strategic policies to redesign our cities.

In that regard, a March 29, 2009 article, entitled "Reinventing America's Cities: The Time is Now," by the architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff in the New York Times was particularly welcome for a number of reasons. First, it appeared in a publication that is influential and widely read by the professionals and policy makers responsible for shaping our cities. Second, instead of the often fawning tone of articles of one-off spectacular buildings by star architects, this essay was measured, thoughtful, and highlighted modest yet significant efforts by architects, urban designers, and planners to redesign cities such as New Orleans, Los Angeles, New York, and Buffalo. Finally, the article avoids the singular and overly narrow visions for future cities that are commonplace: "green cities", "technology cities", and so forth. Anyone who has practiced in the field is well aware that cities are complex and multifaceted, and their design requires prioritizing multiple goals and making difficult tradeoffs between immediate needs (e.g. affordable housing) and long-term objectives (e.g. economic vitality).

However, the article reveals an important bias that is prevalent among American architects and urban designers, and that limits significant and consequential innovations in reinventing American cities: a condescending attitude towards so-called "third world cities."

In discussing plans for restoring the Los Angeles River to a more ecologically sound condition and the possibility of converting Wilshire Boulevard to an urban center through a concentration of public transportation and cultural institutions, Mr. Ouroussoff writes: "A citywide plan that anchored Los Angeles along two major axes-the green river and the asphalt boulevard-could save it from becoming a third world city." I have seen the phrase "third world city" being repeated over and over verbally and in writing as a condescending comment meant to evoke a lack of planning foresight, low design and development standards, and a general sense of disrepair and even chaos. There are several self-imposed constraints that come with such thinking.


A marketplace in New Delhi: Isn't this what the West aspires to?

A careful observation of so-called "third world cities" in Asia, Africa, and Latin America reveals that these cities possess the same qualities that most American urban centers aspire towards, albeit in different forms. The historic centers of cities such as Mexico City, Mumbai, and Marrakech, are full of life and vitality, and have been so for centuries. One finds a rich mix of land uses, including everything from open air markets to schools and workshops that produce stunning handicrafts, and a vital pedestrian street life of people going to work, to school, and perhaps most important of all, to interact with each other socially. Many business interactions are in fact social interactions, conducted over a cup of tea or as part of a longer conversation-patterns of behavior that are crucial to a healthy social fabric. These historic centers represent some of the most promising aspects of cities as places of commerce, culture, and conversations that lead to great understanding, entrepreneurship, and even larger social movements.

American cities can also learn from the manner in which "third world cities" live comfortably to this day with history, instead of either treating it as a museum frozen in time or as something to be emulated in an uncritical manner. These cities are among the oldest in the world, even more so than the European cities that Mr. Ouroussoff and practicing urbanists tend to place on a pedestal. In "third world cities", centuries old architecture lives comfortably with new construction much in the same way as ancient social and cultural traditions evolve alongside newer social norms and structures. The older structures are exemplars of ecologically sensitive design long before it became fashionable for American and European academics and star architects to expound the virtues of sustainability and green design. For example, centuries old buildings are cool in the summer without computer-aided sensors; rather, they do so in highly-cost effective ways, by orienting windows away from the summer sun, providing simple shading devices, construction consisting of thick walls, and fenestration that encourages cross ventilation. For example, I remember growing up comfortably in the 100 degree heat of India without air conditioning or adjustable thermostats.

As American designers invent innovative ways to reduce our ecological footprint on the earth, they would do well to observe the centuries-old low-impact lifestyles of those in "third world cities". Thus, along side green roofs, bio swales, and permeable surfaces, we should also be designing simple, but widespread, ways of recycling materials on a daily basis as part of a network of mobile street entrepreneurs and small scale economic activities such as repair and refurbishing rather than disposing of damaged goods, as is common in the U.S. and Europe. In "third world cities", so-called "green jobs" have existed for centuries in the construction industry for the repair and maintenance of existing buildings, recycling everything from shoes to typewriters, and using materials such as rammed earth and straw bales to construct modest structures.

Instead of demeaning so-called "third world cities", we would do well to observe, understand, and adapt such approach on a much more widescale basis. In order to truly reinvent American cities, we have to look farther afield at the resourceful design innovations of the cities of Asia, Africa, and Latin America .


Dr. Aseem Inam is a Visiting Lecturer in the School of Architecture and Planning, and a Residential Scholar at Simmons Hall at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Before coming to MIT, Aseem was an Associate and Senior Project Manager at Moule & Polyzoides Architects and Urbanists in Pasadena, California.

Comments

Comments

Trash for one is treasure for another

I quite agree that the attempts being made by american city planner to diversify and create vibrancy in their urban centers could learn many things from the developing world cities. However, I am skeptical about learning from the so called 'green jobs' in developing countries. Much of the recycling enterpreneurs of developing nation aren't aware or protected from the nasty pollutants they handle. They also recycle plastics and newsprint to be used to store sell vegetables and street food. God only knows what chemical seep into our systems through these 'recycled' products. I would love to see a reduction of the use an throw behavior pattern of the west, but I am more inclined to see provisions that protect the rag pickers and small recyclers from such health hazards.

It is also sad how outdated western development concepts and being steamrolled over traditional urban spaces in developing nations, all in the name to make them 'World Class'. Planner and politicians in developing nations have to be hit in the head with the fact that the key factors of the Londons and New Yorks is that they provide a sense of equity to their citizens in the public realm. They need to take DUbai out of thier heads and think more Hong Kong.

I really appreciate this

I really appreciate this thoughtful, nuanced piece. More than anything, it reiterates something that I remember hitting me very strongly when I spent a summer in Delhi a few years ago: so much of what U.S. planners are laboring mightily to foster in US cities -- small-scale commerce, people on foot, a sense of community, a vernacular building culture -- exists organically in the cities of the "Third World."

I remember trying to make this point in a presentation to a civil engineering firm in Delhi that is doing infrastructure projects all over Asia and Africa. I'm not sure I was able to get people there to understand the devastating consequences of mid 20th century American urban policy -- to them it all seemed part of what India will need to do in order to become "up-to-date" and "modern." I wanted to say, "Don't do it! Modernize your infrastructure (carefully), fix up your beautiful old buildings, but be thoughtful about protecting the great things that already exist in your cities, which you don't perceive now and that you otherwise won't miss until they are gone." But I'm just not sure that I was able to get my point across. Things are happening in India and China and elsewhere at a pace that makes 1950s-era U.S.-style urban renewal look carefully considered by comparison.

In any event, the "developed" and the "developing" world need to learn from each other -- we in the West aren't the only ones who have something to teach, and they aren't the only ones that have something to learn. I appreciate Dr. Inam's perspective on this and hope to hear more about his work in the future.

Jake Wegmann

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Woman wearing city map tote bag

City Shoulder Totes

Durable CityFabric© shoulder tote bags available from 5 different cities.
$22.00
Book cover of Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Featuring thought-provoking commentary and insights from some of the leading thinkers and practitioners in the field.
$18.95