Wired Says: It's Time for Cities to Favor People, Not Cars
Wired Magazine figures out what the planning world already knows- that there is a need to shift planning policies away from auto-oriented development and towards the pedestrian.
"Los Angeles and countless other cities - Phoenix, Houston and Atlanta come to mind - are far more friendly to cars than people, having been built according to land use policies that all but put people behind the wheel. It's an unsustainable model, and it must change.
That was the message transportation planner Timothy Papandreou brought to "Expanding the Vision of Sustainable Mobility," a symposium sponsored by the Art Center College of Design. The school could be called the Harvard of transportation design, and two-day conference drew experts in fields as varied as urban planning and aerospace engineering to discuss where the future of mobility lies.
Papandreou called for an end to "state, federal, and local land use policies that are literally forcing people to have to drive" and told Wired.com we're on the cusp of an inevitable "mode shift" away from individual car ownership toward a greater reliance on mass transit and sustainable transport.
"We're already at that crossroads," he said."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Senate Yeas While House Nays on Transportation - Feb 10, 2012
- NYT Editorial Blasts House Transportation Bill - Feb 10, 2012
- Would People Drive Less if Cities Were Built Differently? - Aug 26, 2011
- Journalists Missing that Road Design is Key to Pedestrian Safety - Jan 21, 2011
- Architect Says 'Stop Planning For Cars' - Sep 03, 2008


















