The 'Creative Class' Takes Over

7 November 2008 - 9:00am

Joel Kotkin believes that the Obama victory is a sign that the 'creative class' - as detailed by Richard Florida - is coming into power, and that traditional business will be pushed aside.

"Today the traditional business leadership, like their Republican allies, present a spectacle of utter disarray. The commercial banks have been effectively nationalized. Many traditional manufacturers, notably automakers, also yearn to suck on the federal teat. Reduced to supplicants, these companies have surrendered their standing as independent players. At the same time, the traditional energy companies, long the whipping boys of Congressional Democrats, will be fully occupied trying to survive the onslaught of anti-carbon regulations now all but inevitable.

In contrast, the creative class comes to power with the wind at its back. Its ascendancy was first predicted by Daniel Bell in his 1973 classic The Coming of Post-Industrial Society as a natural product of the rise of science-based industry. Shortly afterward California's Jerry Brown became the first politician to recognize this shift, embracing Silicon Valley and Hollywood as a counterweight to the industrial, aerospace and agribusiness establishment that had supported both his father, former governor Pat Brown, and Ronald Reagan.

In the ensuing decades, the creative class establishment rallied to different political causes and candidates, including Gary Hart's 1984 presidential campaign and the causes of other so-called "Atari Democrats." Yet it is only this year that its members have, like the Skynet computer system in the Terminator series, reached a level of consciousness about their potential true power."

Source: New Geography, November 6, 2008

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

uber NIMBYism

The biggest difference between the creative class ... environmental policy. Executives at places like Apple, as well as opportunistic investment firms, have become enthusiastic jihadis in the war against climate change. Conveniently, their companies don't tend to be huge energy consumers and, if they make products, do so in largely unregulated facilities in China or elsewhere in the developing world.

WHAT? So using energy in China and making things in China's unregulated pollution generationg factories is now environmentally friendly?

Hypocrisy lives on. The 'cultural creatives are just as craven and mercenatry as previous generations.

No Full Story And No Source For Kotkin Article

...which is probably what it deserves.

Charles Siegel

Not sure what happened

The story link and source are now fixed.

Bookmark and Share
In short, we’ve seen the last of the cheap oil on which we’ve built our economy, our communities, and our daily lives.