Sprawl To Blame for Lack of Community Involvement

21 October 2008 - 12:00pm

In central New Jersey, all the signs that usually indicate extensive community involvement are there: affluence, education, and diversity. But in reality, participation levels are low. A new study shows that sprawl may be the culprit.

"Levels of volunteerism and civic engagement were found to be 'average to low,' despite statistics that also said residents have smaller commutes and shorter workweeks than the national average.

Without public space that encourages informal socializing, or bumping into people as might happen in a small town, people cannot network with each other, she said.

'Strip malls don’t make the same kind of connecting that town centers do,' she said.

Informal interactions increase 'social capital,' a measure of interpersonal networks between people. When it’s high, she said, communities are safer, schools are better, the economy is better, and people are healthier."

Source: Princeton Packet, October 17, 2008

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Sprawl vs Civic Involvement

Didn't Jim Kunstler make this point years ago?

Bookmark and Share
Maybe we should blame Thomas Jefferson. He was the godfather of the urban sprawl racket in America.