Road Closures, Pedestrianization Key to Successful Urbanization
Chris Turner looks at successful car-free pedestrianization and bicycle planning in Copenhagen and Melbourne and wonders why Canada's sprawling, frigid cities can't adopt these ideas as well.
"If the pedestrian revival has a birthplace, it is [Copenhagen]. Considered a dull provincial burg in the 1950s, the cozy Danish capital now routinely tops international quality-of-life rankings - the ultra-hip current affairs journal Monocle recently declared it the world's most livable city. This newfound prominence rests largely on Copenhagen's inviting city centre, which is latticed with a half-dozen pedestrian-only promenades and a dozen car-free squares, stitched to the rest of the city by one of the world's more extensive networks of bicycle paths.
At the height of summer, a quarter-million people stroll Copenhagen's downtown streets each day, and 36 per cent of residents cycle to work, with the help of more than 300 kilometres of dedicated bike lanes and guided in congested areas by bike-only traffic lights...Most days the Strøget - the city's high street and Europe's longest pedestrian thoroughfare - is a forest of marching feet. Café seats encircle every downtown square, many of them draped on cool days in blankets for public use, with more sidewalk cafes crowding the narrowest back lanes.
The challenge [of pedestrianization and bicycle planning] may seem even greater for Canadian municipalities ...[but] Copenhagen has become a global leader in bicycle commuting despite a winter nearly as cold as that in most Canadian cities and much drearier."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- NYC Residents Suggesting Locations for New Bike Share Stations - Sep 16, 2011
- My Future City is Houston? - Aug 22, 2011
- Gas Prices Drive Canadians to Bikes - Aug 14, 2011
- The Paradox of Minimum Parking Requirements for Bars and Taverns - Jul 22, 2011
- Health Concerns For Urban Cyclists - Jul 14, 2011


















Not all pedestrian-only
Not all pedestrian-only projects succeed. Poughkeepsie, NY's Main mall was torn up a few years back, after it became a zone of boarded-up storefronts and crime. Ithaca's Commons isn't a failure, but it has lost all of its "anchor stores."
What are the factors that breed success or failure for these projects? What makes one a destination, and another a place to avoid?
Successful Pedestrian Streets
I have heard that the usual experience is:
if the street is already very busy and successful, making it pedestrian-only will make it even more successful.
if the street is not busy, making it pedestrian-only will make it even less busy.
During the 1960s, it was common to try to revive failing American business streets by making them pedestrian only. This usually made them fail even more badly.
Charles Siegel