The Debate Over Prefab
Prefab is less wasteful, green and affordable? Not according to Chad Ludeman, who has taken the pulse of the prefab field and found it wanting.
"He disputes most of the claims made by those promoting modern prefab...:
1. Prefab is more Affordable
2. Prefab produces less Waste
3. Prefab takes less Time
4. Prefab is more "Green"
He rips into each of these and makes some very good points. However Chad has a real advantage in his timing; prefab costs are fixed, with high capital costs and relatively constant labour costs. Four years ago a carpenter, if you could find one, earned $70K a year; they don't now. A conventional builder needs little more than a pickup truck and a nail gun to get into business, so in hard times the prefab companies cannot compete. In the last housing recession just about every prefab company in the States and Canada went bankrupt because of this, and it is likely to happen again."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- The Shared Developmental Trajectory of Megachurches and Corporate America - Jul 23, 2009
- LEED-ND: Yay or Nay? - Jul 22, 2009
- Should We Plan Cities To Be Temporary? - Jun 30, 2009
- Contemplating a Neighborhood Design Standard - Apr 29, 2009
- Tent Cities As 'Informal Urbanism' - Apr 09, 2009

















Link to Chad Ludeman's Article
Here's a link to the actual article written by Chad Ludeman, if you'd like to start with the points raised by Chad and then move over to the various responses in the rest of the web.