Report Predicts 'Mass Exodus of Vehicles off America's Highways'

3 July 2008 - 8:00am

A new report for a Canadian bank examining the economic impact of rising oil prices predicts that millions of Americans will be forced to give up driving as gas reaches $7.00 a gallon.

"As gasoline prices climb inexorably, American driving habits are going to have to undergo a massive change, mimicking the driving habits long adopted by Europeans who have faced much higher gas prices. Average miles driven will likely fall by as much as 15%, while the market share of light trucks, SUVs and vans will be literally halved, reversing the trend of the last fifteen years. But the most fundamental, and unprecedented change will be in the number of vehicles on the road.

Over the next four years, we are likely to witness the greatest mass exodus of vehicles off America’s highways in history. By 2012,there should be some 10 million fewer vehicles on American roadways than there are today—a decline that dwarfs all previous adjustments including those during the two OPEC oil shocks (see pages 4-8). Many of those in the exit lane will be low income Americans from households earning less than $25,000 per year. Incredibly, over 10 million of those American households own more than one car.

Soon they won’t own any.

More fundamentally, the freeways are about to get less congested. Not only will the number of vehicle registrations in the United States not grow over the next four years, but by 2012 there should be roughly 10 million fewer vehicles on the road in America than there are today. For the past half century, America has spent the bulk of its infrastructure money on building highways—only to see that soon, $7 per gallon gasoline prices will lead to fewer and fewer people using them."

Source: CIBC World Markets, June 26, 2008

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Commute vs. Vacation?

Anyone have an idea about how auto behavior is expected to change when specifically considering driving as a necessity vs. driving for recreation? Or in other words commuting vs. vacation? This report deals with the former, it seems, but I didn't see anything in there about the latter. I was at a conference recently on destination resort development where the industry insiders felt that even with $7 or $8 gasoline that resort visits won't suffer because of how "protective" americans are of their vacations.

It strikes me that while there might be some truth to this, especially among wealthier Americans, EVERYONE will soon start reconsidering their vacation options, if they haven't already, and many of us will be less likely to venture as far away from home or to do so as often. What are the expectations for changes in auto travel for vacationers? Has anyone taken a close look at this?

Electric Cars

Unfortunately, the cost of power for electric cars is equivalent to buying gasoline at about $1.00 per gallon - partly because electricity prices are regulated and are set below market price.

By 2020, virtually the entire American auto fleet will have shifted to plug-in hybrids to avoid high gas prices. As a result, per capita VMT will be back up there again, and it will be difficult or impossible to phase out the dirtiest power plants in order to fight global warming.

The current effects of high gas prices are temporary. They will be permanent only if we deliberately make political decisions to reduce driving - because the cars make our cities and our planet less livable.

Charles Siegel

Changes

if this scenerio really is true, then we best start working on building more alternatives to highway travel. i wonder at what point the freight railroads will find it profitable to get back into the passenger rail business.

private railroads doing passenger rail likelihood

Great question, Jon!
My guess, not very likely.
I think history shows that private freight carriers' main concerns about passenger trains is that they don't interfere with their business, which is suffering from lack of track capacity.

In fact, my guess is the only 'public' issue they are interested in is getting public funds to expand their infrastructure! (which, BTW, I have no problem with, and governments could use these funds as incentive to getting more rights to use their tracks....I'm seeing this in my work on $2 billion of "Trade Corridor Improvement Fund" of Prop' 1B, 2006, in CA. I'm all for the use of these funds for freight rail....the alternative is widening highways..)

It will be up to government entities to expand rail transit - intercity and commuter, IMO, for a long time to come....
Irvin Dawid, Palo Alto, CA

Radical merger of car and rail freight

Inspired by that TV ad about what a 50 mpg car could do for the environment:

Imagine if you could drive your car onto specially designed rail cars for long distance trips. Drive on in say New Jersey and drive off in say Erie, PA and continue the last leg of your trip in your own car.

Each rail car could be detached at specific stops along the way, where drivers would continue on to final destinations.

During the rail journey, you would have to remain in your car and pack all your own food and booze. But you will enjoy some beautiful countryside that only rail engineers now get to see.

I would gladly pay a fare to avoid most of the driving, while having my own car for the "final mile" to my destination.

Bookmark and Share
Under the proposal, the government would assign the populace the task of counting and mapping dog droppings as a first step to greater penalties for owners who fail to clean up after their mutts.