Property Values vs. Affordable Housing
In suburban St. Paul, Minnesota, homeowners are losing the battle to keep affordable housing our of their neighborhoods. This Pioneer Press article includes a video that nicely shows both sides of the issue.
"Greg Bogut lives in a $575,000 home. He can afford it. To him, that makes it affordable housing.
What bothers him is affordable housing that people can't afford without a government subsidy — such as the town homes he can see from his front porch. The affordable complex has slashed the value of his Woodbury house, he says.
"If I had known then what I know now," Bogut said, "I wouldn't have moved here."
He would have had many alternatives. While Woodbury embraces affordable housing — government-subsidized or not — dozens of Twin Cities suburbs don't. Traditionally, homeowners like Bogut have made the suburbs hostile territory for affordable housing. The lack of affordability is written into building codes, integrated into local regulations and woven into suburban culture.
But the anti-affordable way of life is under attack."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Rising Costs of Farmland Affecting Suburban Growth - Jun 15, 2009
- The Troubles Facing Nevada's Master Planned Communities - May 17, 2009
- Property Prices Drop 41% in Dubai - May 06, 2009
- Towards Land Recyclability - Jan 29, 2009
- WalMart Goes NIMBY Against Town Center Plans - Jan 19, 2009


















affordable housing is like paying taxes
In this respect: if anybody should have to do it, everybody (that is, every municipality) should have to do it. Otherwise, the cities that allow it are basically suckers.