Is New Urbanism A 'Last Gasp' Attempt to Reform Suburbanism?
Plans to bring New Urbanist designs into British Columbia will do little to stem suburban sprawl, according to this column from the Globe and Mail.
"In the Lower Mainland's urban fringes, we still take New Urbanism seriously, in the same way we still lust after Ford Explorers. My own view is that history will regard New Urbanism as a last-gasp attempt to reform suburbanism from within, before high energy prices and new respect for land compels much denser development."
"This new wave of high density combined with high amenity is homegrown. It has turned the very word 'Vancouver' into a verb and an ideology: progressive cities now 'Vancouverize' because they believe in 'Vancouverism.'"
"We Vancouverites sell American planners and developers high density, high amenity urban development attuned to the needs of the new century. Then local developers like the Century Group go consultant shopping in Miami and end up buying the terminally pleasant nostalgia of New Urbanism. Go figure."
"Actually, checking the figures helps puncture New Urbanism's claims, especially the spiel that schemes like the one for the Southlands development present a radical increase in suburban residential densities. While this may be true by the standards of the sunbelt United States, Canadian cities have historically developed at higher densities, largely because we lack such sprawl-inducing public policies as the tax deductibility of mortgage interest and the federally funded interstate highway system."
"New Urbanism is dangerous because it claims to cure the very sprawl and social class separation that it causes."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related News Stories
Is Vancouver Ready For EcoDensity? - Apr 14, 2008
Are Churches Causing Sprawl? - Jun 27, 2008
'Alarming' Increases In Shopping Center Vacancies - Jun 20, 2008
An Italian View of U.S. Planning - Jun 20, 2008
Toronto Looks West - Jun 18, 2008








Different Reaction To The Same Project
A different reaction to the same project was posted on planetizen just slightly later and is at http://www.planetizen.com/node/31296. This one seems much more knowledgeable.
Charles Siegel
Misinformation
Unfortunately, the author of this article did not do any of his research into the particulars of the DPZ plan. When subtracting the 2/3 of the property preserved as open space and farmland, the density is actually 25 units per acre. In a few locations, the density rises to 80 units per acre.
Say what you will about developing at the metropolitan edge, but the project is the first of its kind -- an explicitly agriculturally based new urban plan with food production at all transect levels. From window boxes to community gardens to large farms. The project will also provide a there, there. Maybe residents will no longer have to drive miles and miles to Vancouver for some true urbanity and daily uses.