Candidates Sit Idly While Sprawl Thrives and Cities Die

9 May 2008 - 9:00am

This piece from The Cleveland Free Times argues that policy can and does encourage sprawl, and none of the candidates running for president will do anything to combat these policies. Meanwhile, American cities will continue to die off.

Sponsored Advertisement
Advertise on Planetizen

"The truest true fact of American politics is that no candidate running this year is going to upset or even challenge the suburban sprawl industry. Sprawl is the endless increase in housing supply, the endless outward redistribution of population from cities and older suburbs, the endless federal subsidy for roads, and the endless chatter about 'good schools' that is just a code for 'schools without poor, visible minorities' that dominates American political life."

"Americans tend to believe that sprawl is a natural consequence of "free market" forces when, in fact, sprawl is a consequence of governmental decision-making made by governments that are responsive to one single industry. Sprawl exists because of a bipartisan commitment to avoiding any talk about reining in the immense power of the real-estate industry."

"That means that the long-avoided discussions America ought to have on race, on climate change, on imported energy, on highway construction and on agriculture will all continue to lack a certain element of reality."

"Meanwhile, as the silence continues, sprawl continues to rule. And American cities will continue to die."

Source: The Cleveland Free Times, Apr 30, 2008

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Cleveland isn't America

This article certainly describes Cleveland, Buffalo, etc. quite well.

But there are parts of America (especially on the coasts) where cities are doing fairly well- where people move to suburbia not because cities are undesirable, but because they are priced out of the red-hot market for city living.