Words Of Advice For The New Urbanism Movement

21 April 2008 - 12:00pm

While The New Urbanism has certainly helped to change the way people think about how communities can be built, it's still seen as a boutique product. More needs to be done if New Urbanist developments are to really compete with mainstream sprawl.

Sponsored Advertisement
Advertise on Planetizen

"Since the movement’s pioneering couple, Andrés Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, designed the Florida panhandle community of Seaside back in 1980, the number of successful New Urbanist communities has steadily increased across the country. These include “greenfield” projects on undeveloped exurban land and inner-city, government-subsidized neighborhood developments that have replaced dysfunctional Urban Renewal–era housing projects. Still, while the New Urbanism set the stage for the current displacement of shopping malls by pedestrian-friendly, streetscape-oriented “lifestyle centers,” the New Urbanist share of U.S. property development remains minute. From tiny “infill” developments in sparsely-settled suburbs or deteriorated city blocks to large-scale urban plans, the project total probably comes to less than 1,000.

And so the vibes at the conference, which took place at the Lyceum in Alexandria and in the Caucus Room of the Cannon House Office Building on Capitol Hill, resembled those of a countercultural cabal. After more than a quarter-century of New Urbanism, proclaimed Stefanos Polyzoides—who, with his wife Elizabeth Moule, heads a top-flight urban-design practice in Pasadena, California—“there’s no indication that the system of building in this country is even dented.” In other words, sprawl still reigns, and so do the sundry forms of architectural dysfunction afflicting the nation’s public realm. The New Urbanists have changed the conversation, but they haven’t changed the world. At least, not yet."

Source: City Journal, Apr 18, 2008

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Make New Urbanism more accessible and affordable

It costs $185 (my monthly utilities bills) to join the Congress for New Urbanism. It costs $375 (my monthly car payment) to join Urban Land Institute. How about a membership rate that actually is *affordable* to the working class?

Make sprawl illegal

1. Alter the zoning codes to make urban sprawl (i.e. car-oriented development) impossible to build under any circumstances.

2. Alter the zoning codes to make new-urbanist/transit-oriented/traditional neighborhood design the only permitted type of development under all circumstances.

This should be done immediately if we are going to solve both climate change and the peak oil crisis. There is no way to solve the peak oil crisis and climate change while maintaining a one car per person paradigm, period. Alternative fuels are great but they will not change this reality.