Growth Boundary Not Needed
This editorial argues that a growth boundary is not the right way to control suburban growth in Salem, Oregon.
"The vast majority of the traffic does not comprise trucks running between Interstate 5 and greater Polk County or the coast, but rather automobiles commuting from the West Salem suburbs to the downtown core. This is much more a local problem than a regional problem."
"As a result, their traffic modeling shows that the further away from the downtown core the prospective bridge is located, the less effective it becomes. My previous thoughts of a Lockhaven/I-5 connection would be largely ineffective in relieving congestion downtown."
"Salem's inner neighborhoods, on the other hand, are neglected while the city instead chooses to emphasize growth around its outer fringes. Is this really a sustainable model for our city, as transportation costs soar for those in increasingly outlying areas while inner neighborhoods, with their shorter commutes, decay? What will that model look like if gas is $6 or $10 per gallon? Can we even predict what transportation costs might be in 30 years?"
"Choosing to live in an outlying area always has brought increased commute times and related expenses -- it's a package deal."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related News Stories
Portland Begins Process For Streetcar Expansion - Oct 30, 2007
'Portland Effect' Can Help Nation's Congestion Capital - Sep 21, 2007
Will Portland's New Transit Mall Exclude Buses? - Jun 03, 2007
Series Covers 'Planning In The West' - Sep 15, 2006
Learning From Portland: Linking Land Use And Transportation - Aug 20, 2006







