DC's Good And Bad Design Developments Of 2000
9 January 2001 - 5:00am
A review of some of the good and bad developments in architecture and planning for the Washington D.C. region.
"What better time to reflect upon some pluses -- and a few minuses -- in the region's new and proposed architecture,planning and urban development?"
Source:
The Washington Post, December 30, 2000
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Occupy D.C.'s Urban Design Model - Nov 11, 2011
- Redesigning the National Mall - Sep 09, 2011
- Finally, New and Improved Pentagon 2.0 - Jun 25, 2011
- Celebrating the Mid-Rise Building - May 01, 2011
- D.C. Tops in Green Building - Apr 16, 2011
“
Its very unsuitability for an urban center justifies its current usage as a suburban or ex-urban pattern.
”
Planetizen picks
Contribute
- Why the Politics of Climate Change Matter
- Waste Disposal Becomes Sexy
- Murky Future for Two of D.C.'s Architectural Gems
- The Story Behind One of the Most Controversial Buildings in the Country
- The Benefits of Creating Hybrid Zoning Codes
- The Appeal of In-Town Big Box
- The Growing Appeal of Drinking From the Toilet
- How and Why Does an Architect Become Famous?
- Could Good Design Have Prevented the Housing Crisis?
- NY Times Defends the Port Authority
Volunteerism Plays Critical Role in Reaching World’s Millennium Development Goals
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University
Feb 10, 2012
www.flickr.com
|
