Highway Expansion Plans Justified By Economic Benefits

12 September 2007 - 12:00pm

Plans to widen a highway in British Columbia are being justified by a projection of nearly $4 billion in economic development. Proponents are allaying air quality concerns, arguing that auto emission controls will improve enough to reduce any impact.

"The B.C. Liberals have issued a comprehensive defence of their plan to widen Highway 1 and twin the Port Mann Bridge, saying it will bring almost $4 billion in benefits and have a "negligible" impact on regional air quality."

"The Liberals propose to build the estimated $2-billion project via a public-private partnership, with five years of construction and a 35-year operating agreement all financed by tolls on the bridge crossing. The government submission argues the project will benefit the economy through improved movement of goods, commuters through reduced congestion, and the region through improved transportation."

"While that cost-benefit analysis relies on a number of debatable assumptions, the most controversial part of the submission is likely to be the report on regional air quality and greenhouse gas emissions."

"It begins by noting that air quality has improved because of a decline in emissions brought on by better pollution controls on vehicles. The trend is expected to continue, particularly since the province has announced new standards that will reduce tailpipe emissions by 30 per cent by 2020."

Source: The Vancouver Sun, September 11, 2007

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Liberal Lies

I find it hard to believe the Liberal logic on Gateway. Nowhere in the original plan does it take into account climate change or other environmental impacts. To claim now that more cars won't result in more pollution, is ridiculous.

Bookmark and Share
All of that only scratches the surface of what's wrong with this study. The idea that complex urban development patterns and human behavior can be meaningfully studied according to one primary criteria — density — is wrong from the start.