Don't Say 'Density', Say 'Walkability'
The concept of increasing density has been given a negative connotation of causing crowdedness and eliminating privacy. This article argues that people will respond more favorably to plans that improve walkability.
"How do you reframe the notion of density, a word that suggests eating one's spinach and conjures up images of a hated neighbor playing loud music at 3 a.m.? Hint: it involves your feet."
"The first framing device to make more people embrace the joys of tighter living quarters is carbon footprint, scaring people out of their subdivisions with an ominous rumble of the extinction of the earth if we don't start abandoning our cars and do more walking. The second framing notion is 'walkability.' A compact, walkable neighborhood sounds sociable, old-fashioned, village-like. Not density, but desirability."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Innovation when Good Planning Policy Has Become the Norm - Feb 05, 2012
- North America Rethinks Its Strip Malls - Feb 01, 2012
- Six Trending Urbanist Themes for the New Year - Dec 31, 2011
- As Long as It's Flexible, No End for Urban Retail - Dec 10, 2011
- How - and Where - Should We Live? - Nov 19, 2011



















The problem with "density"
The problem is that the word "density" is frequently used in a qualitative sense, when it is actually something quantifiable. If density is inherently desirable, it should be easy to articulate how dense is dense enough.