Veto Of Infrastructure Proposals May Be Right Choice
This article from Time looks at the shortcomings of the nearly 1,000 Army Corps of Engineers projects facing Senate approval and a Presidential veto, saying the proposals will harm an already broken infrastructure system.
President Bush has vowed "to veto the Water Resources Development Act, a wildly popular collection of 940 Army Corps of Engineers projects, including $3.5 billion for post-Katrina Louisiana and $2 billion for the Florida Everglades. The House passed it Wednesday night in a 381-40 squeaker, and the Senate vote should be similar; archliberal Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chair Barbara Boxer of California and archconservative ranking Republican James Inhofe of Oklahoma can't agree on the color of the sky, but they're both pledging to override a veto."
"But this time, Bush is right. WRDA is a lousy bill, stuffed with more pork than Sonny's Barbecue, coddling a dysfunctional agency, perpetuating a dysfunctional system. Louisiana and the Everglades need help, but they won't get it until Congress fixes the Corps. This bill just sets the stage for future Katrinas."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Parsing the State of the Union Address for Planners - Jan 25, 2012
- Taking Parking Lots Seriously, as Public Spaces - Jan 07, 2012
- Want Your City to Thrive? Get More Bandwidth - Jan 05, 2012
- Learning from State-Level Infrastructure Banks - Jan 04, 2012
- Six Trending Urbanist Themes for the New Year - Dec 31, 2011

















