Segways, Sidewalks, and Scooters

Barbara Knecht's picture

Should Segways be allowed on sidewalks? Should all bicycles travel only in designated bike lanes? Should motorized scooters be treated as if they are wheelchairs? Where should rollerblades, skateboards, adult tricycles, bikes with trailers or kick scooters travel? The world of personal mobility is expanding. And so is the pressure in favor of alternatives to the grandaddy of personal mobility -- the automobile. In spite of its importance as image-maker and status-definer, a car is just a method for getting a person from Point A to Point B. Moving people -- that's its basic purpose.

But all those other modes are having a hard time finding their place on the streets and sidewalks of our cities. It seems someone always thinks one or more of the alternatives is unsuitable. What problems do they pose? They endanger others (skateboards). They go too fast (Segways). They are too big (scooters). They are for recreation (bicycles). They commandeer the roadway (roller blades). They aren't safe (all of the above). Is there any one of those characteristics that doesn't apply to an automobile?

We have given over a disproportionate percentage of the city to the movement and storage of cars. For the most part, only the automobile and the pedestrian have identified space in which to move about in most cities. People who use wheelchairs have a right but they are still looking for the space. All those others are locked in a cutthroat battle to carve out a sliver of roadway or sidewalk – but they are up against pedestrian and automobile advocates ferociously defending their territory.

What is this about? We are arguing about modes of transport -- which ones to ban or allow where and at what times and when driven -- by whom? That discussion will be mired forever in nuanced details. Why can a wheelchair go anywhere, but a Segway, outfitted with a SegSeat can't?

What is a bicycle with an electric motor that can transform from a human powered vehicle to one with a little power assist for someone who is weary or not always strong enough to get up that last hill? Is a four-wheeled scooter an indoor or an outdoor vehicle? Is a skateboard a form of transportation or recreation?

The solution becomes clear if one applies a universal -- human centered -- design approach to the problem. It isn't simple, it is just clear. It ends the discussion about vehicles. It starts a discussion about people and how they can get around in the city. All of these devices, whether you call them personal transport or assisted mobility, whether they are sometimes used for recreation and sometimes they are used for transport, whether they can go quite fast, or are extremely large, they are legitimate solutions that help people move and participate in the world. We can design our cities to accommodate them -- easily -- if and when we decide they are preferable alternatives to the private automobile.

The process starts with deciding that everyone belongs. That most anything is OK as long as it does not adversely impact anyone else. That speed is at the heart of the matter. Speeding skateboards, speeding bikes, speeding cars disrupt -- even kill -- those who move more slowly. So we slow everyone down and give priority to those who are more vulnerable. Those with more power yield to those with less. (Hans Monderman would propose the same surface where each person is responsible for the wellbeing of everyone else.) Then we can celebrate the magnificent ingenuity that thinks up and makes transport to move every kind of person to the place he or she wants to go.

Barbara Knecht is director of design at the Institute for Human Centered Design (formerly Adaptive Environments), a non-profit organization committed to enhancing the experiences of people of all ages and abilities through excellence in design.

Comments

Comments

Alternative Mobility lanes

While I was riding my bike today I was thinking about something I had seen up in San Francisco over the weekend. It was a segway tour group. I don't have any other information on it, but here is their website http://www.sfelectrictour.com/ . I wondered how they handled local regulations and whether they were allowed to use both the sidewalk and roads. I also remembered a video put out regarding separated bike lanes in New York. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONS2ptAR4mo Combining these two ideas would seem to call for separated alternate mobility lanes. These lanes would be regulated by requiring speeds to fall within a max-min range. Pedestrians would be prohibited (unless sidewalks are available) and electric or gas powered vehicles would be limited to a speed of 30 or 40 mph (and maybe a decibel limit as well.)

Just a thought and not a fully developed one at that.

SF and Segways

San Francisco banned Segways on sidewalks a couple of years ago. The tour gets around it by using roads and "multi-use" (bike) paths, which are both legal for Segway use.

same issues with some creative solutions

Friction between mobility expectations, and what we need to be able to get around with certainty, must be the same the world over.

In Guidelines for Walkable Coastal Environments older people in three small communities Portarlington, Indented Head and St Leonards proposed solutions for gopher [personalised mobility device] - pedestrian friction. In these communities, as in many smaller coastal communities in Australia, more than half the population is aged over 55 years

Gopher Lane solutions remain unimplemented as the road authority says they are currently unlawful, and without careful monitoring and evaluation there is no way to for the local government to test whether they are safer than the current solutions. Currently people are either on road in unmarked lanes against oncoming traffic, or on footpaths scaring older slower walking frailer adults.

It would be great to see these solutions thought about more globally...

See http://www.disabilitynews.infoxchange.net.au/news/items/226756-upload-00... and http://www.geelongcity.vic.gov.au/common/Public/Documents/8cbc6ec5f1a686...

A Health Impact Assessment of Strategic Footpath Routes and inclusive footpath treatments in these locations is currently being prepared.

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Women's t-shirt with map of Los Angeles

City T-Shirts for the ladies!

Women's Supersoft CityFabric© Fashion Fit Tees. Now available in six different cities.
$24.00
Book cover of Where Things Are from Near to Far

Where Things Are From Near to Far

This engaging children's book about planning illustrates that "every building has its place."
$19.95