The New Metropolitanism?
Good middle class suburbs aren't sustainable without a vibrant city, and vice versa, argues a recent article in the Houston Chronicle.
"In a series of in-depth articles by leading experts on cities, the [Houston] Chronicle has engaged the public about choices and directions for the future. Thus far, the debate seems polarized, probably confusing to many citizens, with the "Suburbanists" (Tory Gattis and Joel Kotkin) pitted against the "Urbanists" (generally represented by David Crossley)."
"The future of Houston should not be the result of a clash of ideologies, a slugfest of slogans. The city needs to learn from the suburbs — more planned communities and "town centers." The suburbs, in turn, need more urbanity and walkable traditional neighborhoods like The Heights and Southampton. We need a solid pragmatism, combining our great pro-growth, pro-business approach with a bold and innovative quality-of-life agenda, leading to a coordinated regional vision for the city and its suburbs. This is not an ideological "either-or," but a "both-and" of grass-roots realism."
The urbanist writer Jane Jacobs said it this way, "the purpose of cities is to create the middle class." This is the "New Metropolitanism."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Houston Densifies and Diversifies Housing - Jan 04, 2012
- LA Artist Reopens Derelict JC Penney As Art Complex - Dec 13, 2011
- Planting Parks to Remedy Blight - Nov 03, 2011
- Austin Releases An All Encompassing New 30 Year Plan - Sep 29, 2011
- Rethinking the Houston Suburbs - Mar 18, 2011

















