Blade Runner Watch: A New Sign on the Bay Bridge

I drive the Bay Bridge just about every work day. I'm not proud of this fact. I never expected to be one of those dreaded suburban commuters, living off urban sprawl, the sole occupant of a compact car inching through rush hour traffic twice a day.
So sue me. Or better yet, give me enough money to afford a house in San Francisco. Until then, Berkeley it is.
But on my morning drive last week I saw a new feature amid the landscape of cargo containers that borders the southern side of the Bay Bridge toll plaza—that's on the East Bay side. It was a new billboard, depicted above. I have no idea how it works. But damn, is it bright. It's an active surface—it changes, presumably according to programming, cycling through a bunch of different ads. So what? Well, for one thing, it's the biggest, brightest one of these kind of signs I've ever seen, high resolution and bright enough to be seen in stark California sunlight. And second, it's just another step in the Blade Runnerfication of our cities.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. More after the jump.
I took a bunch of pictures of the sign, at great risk to life and limb. Probably I shouldn't be tinkering with my camera while driving in traffic, is what I'm saying. But look at how amazing this sign is:
It's beautiful. The gantry holding it up has a CBS eye on it, so presumably it's owned by CBS Outdoor, which also runs a lot of the signage in Times Square.
Active surfaces are a signifier of our science fiction future. They were what defined the Blade Runner Los Angeles:
Though you'll note that all those building-sized animated advertisements only showed at night. Then again, that whole movie took place at night. Cheaper to do the special effects, which were, you'll remember, pre-computer-generated imagery. All miniatures, and mattes. Super cool.
I have to admit I was a little disappointed to see the same visual signifiers in an otherwise very nifty movie, Alfonso Cuaron's Children of Men. That first scene, a virtuoso shot following Clive Owen out of a cafe into the street, relies on active surfaces on buildings and buses to convey future-ness in London just like Blade Runner did 25 years ago (yes, it has been that long). That implies, to me, a certain lack of vision...or, alternatively, yet more acceptance that Blade Runner really does depict what the writer Warren Ellis sometimes calls our grim meathook future. Check out his comic book series Transmetropolitan if you want to know what I mean.
So I hereby christen an intermittent, poorly updated, likely-to-vanish-if-I-get-bored feature here on the Interchange: The Blade Runner Watch. Every time I see something in a city that makes the world look more like the movie, I'll post on it. Feel free to contribute; you know how to reach me.
- older posts
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page







Cool? Really?
Have you driven by that sign at night? It's hideous. As you get off the Bay Bridge heading east, it dominates your field of vision and is quite literally blinding it's so bright. I'm not as impressed by the technological achievement as you; I don't think it's any different from the DiamondVision screen at Cal's Memorial Stadium and elsewhere. But at night time, it's an absolute hazard.
That sign is funding part of
That sign is funding part of the new arts charter school going in the long abandoned Fox Theater...
Some of the attention is on a 50-foot-high billboard now going up on Port of Oakland land at the eastern foot of the Bay Bridge. In an unusual wrinkle, part of the money paid by the billboard's owner will help finance a new home for Brown's pet charter school, the Oakland School for the Arts, in the revamped Fox Theater downtown.
The Fox is part of a $65 million city redevelopment project being put together by Tagami, the Foster consultant. Under the billboard deal, Foster Media will partner with another outfit, CBS Outdoor, to pay $7.5 million over 20 years to Brown's arts school, plus $8 million over the same period to the Port of Oakland.
Source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/11/BAGDBOJ7SL1....
Mr. Rogers...welcome to the neighborhood
I'm sorry...I couldn't help it.
I'm so glad to see the comments above. When I read this post I was immediately struck by the inconsistencies (Berkeley Affordable? and Auto dependent..hardly). Unfortunately I didn't have the time to respond. I know there are parts of Berkeley that aren't walk to the Bart accessible, but that is what bikes are for, and if the Wired offices are still where they were in the late 90's than you're looking at a 4-5 block walk from one of the Market Street stations.
So far I have not been impressed with how you are acclimating to your new environment. Cheerleading gentrification, and complaing about traffic in one of the most transit friendly metros in the country are not ways to win friends and influence people in your new city. I beg you, made the reverse migration, let your evil LA ways go.
Bikes, BART, and Rush Hour (and AC Transit)
Unfortunately BART does not allow bikes between Oakland and SF during rush hour. But then there's AC Transit and its transbay buses, assuming their bike racks have enough space...
Folding Bikes On BART
But they do allow folding bikes. I briefly did that commute: rush hour BART plus folding bike.
Charles Siegel
the sign it nutty
i noticed the sign about a week ago and i hope the port authority it getting paid for it...remember when u take the bridge you support one type of business (port authority and taking the train supports another (caltrain).
why don't you BART?
You live in Berkeley, work in SF.... wny not BART?
Easier To Be Sardonic Than To BART
It is obviously easier to be sardonic about how inhuman our cities are than it is to take BART and make things a bit better.
Charles Siegel
Berkeley is an affordable alternative to SF...?
You say... "give me enough money to afford a house in San Francisco. Until then, Berkeley it is."
I didn't know that Berkeley was an affordable alternative to SF. Last time I checked, house prices in Berkeley just about as astronomical as in SF. Moreover, how much does it cost to park a car all day long while you're at work in SF...? (not to mention Bridge tolls, cost of gas, plus wear and tear on car, increased carbon emissions, etc., etc.). Do you actually save $$$ living in Berkeley and commute to SF by car, or is it really a lifestyle choice on your part...?
(I'm not knocking Berkeley... I like the place, but, please... an affordable alternative to SF...?).
Christopher C. (SF homeowner)