University Hopes To Help Fight Traffic With Mixed Use Plans

17 March 2007 - 9:00am

Emory University hopes wants provide affordable housing for faculty and staff and tackle the area's traffic problem by building pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use communities on land near campus -- though some area residents aren't sold on the idea.

"Once upon a time, Emory University was a sleepy little college nestled in the matronly bosom of the stately neighborhood of Druid Hills. Today, Emory is a research powerhouse attached to a bustling medical center. More than 12,000 students are enrolled there and the school, hospital and research facilities employ more than 14,000 people.

With an eye toward offering affordable housing within walking distance of the school, Emory officials have been maneuvering to put up mixed-use developments. Providing a way for employees and students to walk or bike to work or class is key to cutting down on the area’s stifling car traffic, so the development is part of the school’s master plan, one that includes the addition of a freshman complex and reconfiguration of adjacent roads.

Traffic aside, it’s understandable that the burgeoning school would need to expand its housing, particularly since houses in the area are much more expensive than the average research assistant or visiting professor can afford.

But some Druid Hills residents are concerned about the size of the developments Emory is backing, what they will do to the personality of the area and even what effect they might have on the area’s very ecology (a little stream called Peavine Creek winds through the neighborhood, and some of its neighbors want to be sure it’s protected).

The Emory-Druid Hills dilemma is a microcosm of the same issue facing the entire metro area, namely what to do to accommodate everyone without encouraging more traffic, while keeping existing residential areas intact. It’s a very tricky problem."

Source: The Sunday Paper, March 18, 2007
Bookmark and Share
All of that only scratches the surface of what's wrong with this study. The idea that complex urban development patterns and human behavior can be meaningfully studied according to one primary criteria — density — is wrong from the start.