Critics Sound Off On 'Ineffective' So Cal Association Of Governments
As cities and counties contribute millions to its budget, the Southern California Association of Governments continues to take flak from planners and local officials who deplore its unrealistic planning efforts and inaccurate growth projections.
"Last year, six counties, 187 cities and the federal government poured $23 million into the obscure Southern California Association of Governments, mandated by state and federal law to make sure Southern California doesn’t devolve into an unplanned and unlivable mess."
"Joel Kotkin, a Los Angeles–based consultant who studies ways in which U.S. cities attract good jobs and build better neighborhoods, says, 'These days I just make fun of SCAG. Their [economic and growth] projections are waaay off.' In the 1990s recession, SCAG warned that the unemployment rate would remain stuck at or above double-digits until decade’s end. Instead, by 1998 joblessness had tumbled. 'SCAG was waaaay off' — by close to 100 percent. Adds Kotkin, 'They go hysterical; they push doomsday scenarios. They figure if they make it sound so terrible, then something will be done. They’re ineffective.'
"Pisano says, 'We’re trying to make our voice heard in Washington and Sacramento.' But not many power players are listening. Part of that, critics say, is because his team’s ideas often sound like a riff from a Cheech and Chong stoner session: Hey, what if we build a high-speed super-railway, and then pull the 18-wheelers off the 710 and give them their own separate freeway?"
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- HSR Too Slow? Blame CEQA - Nov 19, 2009
- All Eggs in the HSR Basket - Nov 16, 2009
- California Seeks Statewide Growth Strategy - Nov 09, 2009
- There Are Planners, And There Are Politicians - Nov 09, 2009
- California Election Results Reverse Trend on Growth - Nov 05, 2009


















Opinion, NOT news
I was disappointed to read this article on this website. I look to Planetizen for news and information on activities and ideas on the cutting edge of the field of public planning. This article only served to unfairly discredit an organization that has for many years been at the forefront of regional planning in the United States. Southern California faces unique challenges that require innovative and sometimes unpopular approaches. To those who would criticize an organization for trying to address these regional dysfunctions and for promoting the goal of regional coherence, I respond that your opinions should be confined to an editorial page of a local newspaper, not in the news section of a professional journal. One of the tenets of Planetizen's forum is that "personal attacks of any kind" are not permitted. I don't understand how the public description of people who have devoted their professional lives to regional improvement as "planning nerds" and as "a jargon-addicted bureaucrat" do not qualify as personal attacks....
Mike Gainor
New Facilities Planner
Los Angeles Unified School District
Crawler gets opinion and news.
I look to Planetizen for news and information on activities and ideas on the cutting edge of the field of public planning.
Mike, I suspect you may want to e-m the Editor and give him your coding suggestions on how to get the news crawler software to filter out op-ed pieces.
Or not, as I want to read the other side's polemics and argumentation (usually just for the observation that their tactics never change). So my e-m will balance out yours.
It is good to know that trotting out Kotkinesque histrionics and dull-edge name-calling is the best they can do. Embrace it.
Best,
D
Because Joel Kotkin is all the rage!
Did you see his rant at last year's California Chapter APA Conference in "the OC"? He sounded like he stepped off the campaign trail with Barry Goldwater.
Joel Kotkin is a neocon so far to the right that he is brushing shoulders with Irving Kristol and the American Enterprise Institute.
Pay no mind to Mr. Kotkin's "opinion" or any of his other critiques on the urban social, economic, political, or built environments. He is merely a neoconservative, libertarian ideologue disguised as an "urban theorist". You couldn't even put Joel Kotkin in the same league as Mike Davis.
But I agree, this sort of material is definitely not suitable for the news section of Planetizen. Just like I said, seems like the planning profession is taking a turn to the "right", as indicative by this website.