Avoiding The 'Local Trap'
With "localism" being trumpeted by all sides of the political spectrum, maybe it's time to ask if local needs are better served by nation states, writes Doug Saunders.
"Just because things are federal does not mean they are more 'remote' or less accountable than provincial or local governments. Quite the contrary: A well-run federal agency is likely to reach people more directly and personally than a poorly run local agency. Federal democracy, with dozens of full-time reporters watching it, well-run offices in every town and well-tested checks and balances, is often going to be more democratic and responsive than anything at a lower level. Localized governments, in fact, can be corrupt, undemocratic and remote in ways that big, central governments often aren't -- not always, but it can happen."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Canadian Opposition Leadership Candidate Unveils Urban Strategy - Oct 25, 2011
- Can a Canadian Company Condemn Your Land? - Oct 19, 2011
- Housing Advocate Jack Layton Dies at 61 - Aug 22, 2011
- Fighting Canadian Sprawl with TDRs - Apr 28, 2011
- Aging Infrastructure Will Cost Canada Big - Apr 08, 2011


















