Scotland's Planning System Changes Leave Out Public

20 November 2006 - 6:00am

Broad changes to Scotland's planning systems were recently approved. A proposal to give communities a third party right of appeal did not pass, leaving many residents concerned that they will have little say in the planning and development of their commun

"Efforts to give communities a third party right of appeal were rejected, as were plans to make it easier to settle disputes over high hedges. Instead, ministers won backing for proposals that would see more consultation with local people, and other parties, before developments in their neighbourhoods are decided upon."

"A controversial aspect of the current planning set-up prevents objectors to any scheme from being allowed a right to appeal where an application has been approved by existing planning authorities, usually the local council. A number of MSPs wanted to see an amendment introduced to the new legislation to provide for this "third party right of appeal"."

Source: The Scotsman, November 17, 2006

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

That Meddlesome Public

It is interesting to note that Andres Duany is at the same time proposing "New Urbanist" plans for Scotland, along with his now-infamous media and lecture circuit blitzkrieg.

Perhaps he feels now that the meddling public has been legislated of the process, he can create a Playa Vista for the British Isles.

Heck, Peter Calthorpe feels the same disdain towards public participation right here in the Bay Area. In a perfect world, ULI and Bruce Ratner would leave out the public completely and hand over entire redevelopment sites to Mr. Calthorpe, so he could work his "lightning fast" magic, designing useless pedestrian pockets and TODs as far as the eye can see.

Who needs the public when you have Prismacolors and hyper-caffinated, gimmicky "design" charrettes.

That Meddling Public...

Yes, that pesky meddling public...

I worked as a planner at a Louisiana Speaks storefront office in SW Louisiana last winter and spring, where daily interaction with local residents was central to our work. As it turned out, local residents and officials were quite passionate about some of their Recovery Projects, so consequently, on their behalf, I assured local folks in my group that I would follow up and keep them informed on the fate of some these projects.

Calthorpe, among others, was hired to carry this planning effort to the next stage, which was to create a plan for regional recovery, incorporating the stated preferences from citizens in the 19 Parishes affected. Despite several attempts to get information from Calthorpe's office in Berkeley, CA, regarding the fate of specific projects in (my) Parish, no information has been forthcoming. Moreover, nobody back in the Parish, so far as I am aware, was ever contacted during the course of this second stage planning effort, which, quite frankly, now in retrospect, just seemed to be a nice piece of Government Pork handed out to well-connected consultants. So far 14 months after the Hurricanes... millions of $$$ for consultants; almost nothing for local citizens (as of last week, out of more than 70,000 destroyed homes in SE Louisiana where claims had been filed, exactly 22 owners (yes, that's 22) have received payment from the FEMA/Road Home program, designed to help folks rebuild their homes or to buy new ones, funded with more than $4 Billion of your (mostly middle-class taxpayers') money (these figures according to New Orleans Times-Picayune).

Regarding Calthorpe and Duany, I think that they sometimes do some nice urban design work, though Duany's designs, particularly, are getting a bit repetitive with yet another "Playa Vista," as you say, this time for cold and bleak northern Scotland. They are both architects, however, and perhaps see the world the way architects do, which is to say that society's problems can be solved simply with the right architecture and urban design. Moreover, designers, particularly big-ego designers, typically don't value the opinion of others when it comes to design matters. They don't... really!

So, despite all the talk about "design charettes" and "public input", designers like Calthorpe and Duany come to public meetings with their canned road show (like the one in Lake Charles) and their minds made up. There may be some audience give and take during the road show presentation, with perhaps one of the consultants' flunkies duly writing down what all the local yokels have to say, but at best this will find itself in an appendix of whatever planning document the consultants are getting paid to produce. Indeed, no room for a meddling public.

TND conflation.

They are both architects, however, and perhaps see the world the way architects do...[m]oreover...big-ego designers, typically don't value the opinion of others when it comes to design matters. They don't... really!

Exactly.

A city with which I am familiar just went through this same thing, and they had to let go the architectural firm because of a lack of responsiveness to changes in design.

There is a difference between big-ego starchitects insisting on their design only, and planners who work on a project and gain consensus and buy-in from the public.

Let's not paint all who work on TND/CNU projects with the same brush, nor conflate one with the other, please.

Best,

D

He is specifically describing Calthorpe....

Calthorpe has actually gotten to the point in which he shares many of the same personality traits as the Post-Modernist starchitects, it you haven't noticed. Watch him speak sometime at a CNU conference and you'll agree.

He just operates on a larger geographic scale and feigns public participation, when in fact all along, he has his mind already made up in terms of how he personally envisions how a particular development should look like.

Calthorpe likes to distinguish himself from Duany and the other east coast new urbanists by stating that "architecture and style doesn't matter, let's get on with the pressing issues of regional planning" when in fact his authoritarian approach is identical to Duany's, only he doesn't have the patience or design skills to deal with form-based codes and design guidelines (remember, he is an architectural school dropout). He would rather play around with GIS maps and "conceptual" land use plans.

I'm thinking he had a case of the "Bill Gates syndrome" and felt he didn't need to matriculate with an Ivy League graduate degree back in the early 70's, he was better than that, a real "visionary".

And NU Is Popular

Despite these complaints, people keep voting with their feet for New Urbanism by moving to developments in this style.

Imagine what the designs would be like if Reed Kroloff and the avant-gardists were in charge of planning for New Orleans.

Charles Siegel

Who Voted?

None of the people who lost their homes in the Lower 9th Ward or Plaquemines Parish for that matter ever voted for, or even asked for NU-style developments or "Katrina Cottages".

All they wanted were homes, plain and simple. They could care less if Thom Mayne or Stephanos Polyzoides designed them.

And FEMA hasn't even given them that.

So it really has nothing to do with design, and has everything do do with reestablishing a sense of normalcy which will most likely be forever lost in Southern Louisiana, no matter how many sketches Calthorpe can come up with.

The only people who are "voting with their feet" as you curiously put it are as we speak shopping in lifestyle centers for Tiffany bracelets and Brooks Brothers suits in places such as Otay Ranch Town Center in Chula Vista, CA, because they can afford it.

Curious

The only people who are "voting with their feet" as you curiously put it

No.

And it's not curious at all.

It's a standard microecon term. Charles is saying, for places other than NOLA, people Tiebout sort to places they want to be or to get away from; folks are sorting to places that happen to increasingly be areas with CNU/TND designs, as they are attractive, walkable (non-autocentric) and contain many desired amenities.

And your curious continued conflation below is interesting: you conflate FEMA incompetence with architects not being able to come up with a plan. Illuminating.

Best,

D

Nothing illuminating here...

Just plain, common sense.

Please describe the demographic you are taking about who wants to "get away". It certainly isn't the people in South Louisiana who are supposedly "benefiting" from the dazzling plans in which Peter Calthorpe has come up with for the pork barrel farce that is Louisiana Speaks. In reality, they are the ones who were stuck in the Superdome the days after Katrina, they were the ones who could barely get a bus out of town, only to find themselves in totally foreign places such as Salt Lake City and Albuquerque. They are the ones who will never own a home again in New Orleans, or in other parts of South Louisiana for that matter.

If the people you and Charles are talking about are the ones who "sort" to places which offer CNU/TND amenities, well then, you are absolutely correct. I see them everyday on bluetooths, sipping their lattes, reading J Crew catalogs, pushing their jogging strollers, and getting ready for their spin class, which is of course conveniently located adjacent to transit, in case they feel the urge to go shopping downtown afterwards. Three words closely describe the above-mentioned TOD (yet primarily auto-oriented development) to a tee, "Rio Vista West".

I'm sure you've both read the book written in 2000 by David Brooks entitled, "Bobos in Paradise". It bares a striking resemblance to the TOD/TND amenity-seeking demographic cohort you mention.

Wide-Spread Support in LA

I wasn't there, but I heard there was widespread support in Lousiana and Alabama for traditional neighborhood design - from a wide range of economic classes.

When Portland backed this sort of design, you could blame it on latte-sipping liberal elitists, but no longer. I don't think the politicians in Lousiana and Alabama who pushed for TND are liberals or latte sippers.

There is no benefit to using this sort of shallow, stereotyped name calling. I myself have never had a latte in my life.

Charles Siegel

Where is the support? It's not from the refugees living abroad

Have you read the transcripts of the charrettes and public hearings? Do you know what the people are really saying in the town halls in the parishes and counties throughout Louisiana and Mississippi.

Most of them are completely disillusioned, could care less about TND or TODs, and just want their homes back. It really has nothing to do with what type of GIS exhibits Calthorpe can produce, or what form-based codes can be developed by UDA.

The only ones who are supporting CNU concepts are like you said, the politicians who are graciously being lobbied by Duany and Calthorpe for the opportunity to implement their "vision" on the Gulf Coast. Google Jim Barksdale, Haley Barbour, Ray Nagin, and Mary Landrieu to educate yourself on their heavy-handed, misguided, and political cronyist influence on the rebuilding (or lack thereof) process.

This is not about me or you, or how we "label" each other, so get over it.

This is about those who have lost their homes, who were betrayed by FEMA and the Bush Administration, and who have relatively little say in how the future course of development will take place in their own communities. And on top of this, they are being encouraged to adopt CNU principles at what couldn't be a worse time in their lives?

Please.

Thom Mayne And Normalcy

If Thom Mayne designed the houses, they would never reestablish a sense of normalcy.

Charles Siegel

The real point is...

The real point is, there will never be a sense of normalcy, unless the real issues of affordable housing and economic restructuring are addressed.

Who cares if the Post-Modernists, ULI, AIA, ASLA, APA, or CNU gets to the table first. Neither of them are producing results for the people who really need them.

Just useless plans with a bunch of green dots, indicating locations where former residents are about to have their properties condemned for "open space".

Until then, places like Houston will continue to serve as semi-permanent safety valves for the lower-income former residents of New Orleans.

Bookmark and Share
The World Parking Symposium is meant to generate discussions about parking impacts, how the field is evolving and what new research is needed.