Bruegmann's Soft Spot For Sprawl
18 October 2006 - 9:00am
Alex Marshall rebuts sprawl arguments posited by Robert Bruegmann's "Sprawl: A Compact History".
"...Bruegmann is essentially wrong in his overall thesis, which is that sprawl is mostly a product of people buying what they want and therefore a good thing. In Bruegmann's view, sprawl has given the middle class the type of large homes that only the aristocracy once enjoyed. Side effects such as loss of open space or traffic congestion are explained away, and sprawl critics are called cultural elitists."
Full Story:
Soft on Sprawl
Source:
Governing Magazine, October 13, 2006
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Innovation when Good Planning Policy Has Become the Norm - Feb 05, 2012
- Six Trending Urbanist Themes for the New Year - Dec 31, 2011
- As Long as It's Flexible, No End for Urban Retail - Dec 10, 2011
- How - and Where - Should We Live? - Nov 19, 2011
- Senate Approves Federal Funding for NJ Rail Tunnel - Nov 15, 2011
“
However, the political reality since the Ronald Reagan/Margaret Thatcher years has promoted the individual pursuit of happiness while systematically clamping down on planning—even if it means that one’s single-minded pursuit of happiness might contribute to unhappiness for themselves and others around.
”

















