Bruegmann's Soft Spot For Sprawl

18 October 2006 - 9:00am

Alex Marshall rebuts sprawl arguments posited by Robert Bruegmann's "Sprawl: A Compact History".

"...Bruegmann is essentially wrong in his overall thesis, which is that sprawl is mostly a product of people buying what they want and therefore a good thing. In Bruegmann's view, sprawl has given the middle class the type of large homes that only the aristocracy once enjoyed. Side effects such as loss of open space or traffic congestion are explained away, and sprawl critics are called cultural elitists."

Full Story: Soft on Sprawl
Source: Governing Magazine, October 13, 2006
Bookmark and Share
However, the political reality since the Ronald Reagan/Margaret Thatcher years has promoted the individual pursuit of happiness while systematically clamping down on planning—even if it means that one’s single-minded pursuit of happiness might contribute to unhappiness for themselves and others around.