Home

Study Shows Cost Savings Of Suburbs Are An Illusion

Posted by: Christian Peralta
Thanks to: Dan Malouff
12 October 2006 - 12:00pm

A new study suggests that the traditional wisdom that suburbs are more affordable places to live than cities may be wrong. Although housing costs may be lower in suburbs, the difference is often outweighed by drastically increased transportation.

Sponsored Advertisement
Advertise on Planetizen

"One of the lures of the outer suburbs is more house -- maybe even one with a big yard -- for less money. But a new study shows that the savings are illusory: The costs of longer commutes are so high that they can outweigh the cheaper mortgage payments."

"A study of Washington and 27 other metropolitan areas by the Center for Housing Policy found that the costs of one-way commutes of as little as 12 to 15 miles cancel any savings on lower-priced outer-suburban homes."

"Barbara J. Lipman, an author of the study, said that people tend to focus on all the zeroes that differentiate the price of a closer-in house from one in the outer suburbs, but they don't realize how much they're spending on commuting costs, such as gas, tires and insurance."

" 'Even if you save a couple of hundred dollars a month on your mortgage, it doesn't nearly outweigh the costs of the cars you are driving,' she said."

Full Story: Around D.C., a Cheaper House May Cost You
Source: The Washington Post, October 12, 2006
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Planning is not rocket science

Submitted by misterconcrete on 12 October 2006 - 5:30pm.

Planning is not rocket science. It's mostly common sense. But planning has no influence anyway. All those suburbs were rubber-stamped by PLANNERS. Planning should commit suicide as a profession.

»