Planning On The Ballot

11 October 2006 - 2:00pm

The Kelo decision spurs ballot measures to restrict eminent domain and "regulatory takings".

More than a year after Suzette Kelo and several of her neighbors in New London, Conn., lost their battle against eminent domain in the United States Supreme Court, the reaction to the ruling has made property rights one of the most closely watched ballot measures nationwide.

Already, 30 state legislatures have enacted restrictions on eminent domain in response to the ruling. Now voters here [in Idaho] and in 11 other states will consider property rights measures in November, making it the election's most prevalent ballot issue.

Most of the measures would limit eminent domain to some degree, while others in Western states, would go further, imposing new restrictions on government's ability to enforce zoning laws, even if those laws are intended to reduce sprawl and improve safety....

"The thing is an abomination, the way it's written, the way it's being sold," said Nils Ribi, a City Council member in nearby Sun Valley who opposes the Idaho measure.

Supporters of the ballot measures in the West - often called "kelo plus" - say they want to stop so-called regulatory takings, the idea that government effectively takes private property when zoning laws limit how it can be used.

Source: The New York Times, October 8, 2006

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How bad can it get?

This has to be the worst article I've read so far on the property rights issues.

Bookmark and Share
These practices are also inequitable since they force non-drivers to subsidize parking costs, reduce travel options for non-drivers, and reduce housing affordability.