Sprawl Isn't So Bad
6 October 2006 - 2:00pm
Blogger Aaron Donovan attends a recent book talk by Robert Bruegmann provides an irreverent analysis of the author's defense -- and definition -- of sprawl.
"Folks who went to yesterday's Municipal Art Society forum 'Can Sprawl Be Beneficial' heard what must be the best possible defense for suburban sprawl from one of its recently arrived boosters: 'I'm not saying that sprawl is good,' said author Robert Bruegmann. 'All I'm saying is that it is not necessarily bad.'
In other, tepid, words: Sprawl is not good. In fact, it might be bad. But it's not necessarily bad."
Full Story:
Can Sprawl Be Beneficial?
Source:
Streetsblog, October 4, 2006
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Parking Vs. Healthy Food - Jun 22, 2009
- The Benevolent Robert Moses of New York's Streets - May 22, 2009
- New York City to Reclaim Broadway For Pedestrians - Feb 27, 2009
- Mid-Town Manhattan To Go Car-Free - Feb 26, 2009
- Bike Lane Controversy Drags On in Brooklyn - Dec 31, 2008
“
There is lots of theory, and lots of wonderful mathematics, and even lots of dealmaking. But the financial engineers are not real engineers who take responsibility for the bridges that fall down. They have no notion of a safety factor.
”


















