It's The Middle Class, Not The Creative Class
"Cities have always served many functions: as centers of religion, political power, and commerce. But one of their most important tasks has been to serve as engines of upward mobility and aspiration. Nowhere has this been more true than in American cities."
"Sadly, in recent decades, this notion of cities as mechanisms for upward mobility has broken down. Many cities, rather than trying to uplift their working class and nurture a middle class, have chosen to concentrate on "luring" the affluent, the hip, and the young as their primary development strategy."
While booming cities of the sunbelt – such as Houston, Orlando, Charlotte, Phoenix and Las Vegas – are widely criticized for their sprawling landscapes and 'un-hip' image, Kotkin makes the case that these are the only cities that are providing opportunity for economic mobility for the middle class.
Rather than attempt to emulate the coastal 'boutique cities' -- which are increasingly only home to the wealthy elite and the low wage workers who serve them -- cities intent on urban revitalization should strive to attract the middle class by focusing on the basics -- affordable housing, good schools, and efficient infrastructure.
[Editors note: Democracy requires free registration to read the complete article]
Joel Kotkin argues that cities need to win back the middle class by focusing on their basic needs -- affordable 'market-rate' housing, schools, and public infrastructure -- if they are to be genuinely successful at urban revitalization.
"Cities have always served many functions: as centers of religion, political power, and commerce. But one of their most important tasks has been to serve as engines of upward mobility and aspiration. Nowhere has this been more true than in American cities."
"Sadly, in recent decades, this notion of cities as mechanisms for upward mobility has broken down. Many cities, rather than trying to uplift their working class and nurture a middle class, have chosen to concentrate on "luring" the affluent, the hip, and the young as their primary development strategy."
While booming cities of the sunbelt – such as Houston, Orlando, Charlotte, Phoenix and Las Vegas – are widely criticized for their sprawling landscapes and 'un-hip' image, Kotkin makes the case that these are the only cities that are providing opportunity for economic mobility for the middle class.
Rather than attempt to emulate the coastal 'boutique cities' -- which are increasingly only home to the wealthy elite and the low wage workers who serve them -- cities intent on urban revitalization should strive to attract the middle class by focusing on the basics -- affordable housing, good schools, and efficient infrastructure.
[Editors note: Democracy requires free registration to read the complete article]
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related News Stories
Bad Mortgages and Gas Prices = Good For Cities? - Jul 01, 2008
Gray Gold: Housing The Baby Boomers - Apr 21, 2008
TODs Prove To Be A Boon For Urban Regions - Jun 13, 2007
Are Cities The Key To Success In The 21st Century? - May 17, 2007
Do We Need To Rethink Gentrification? - Apr 03, 2007








Kotkin Rant
Sure Baltimore and Philly are pursuing gilded-cage downtowns, but so are Houston and Charlotte. Kotkin writes as though the success of the latter is due to their enlightened leadership and the failures of the former due to their dumb elite. Most of the growth in these Sunbelt cities is in their suburbs, not cities, and their growth is due to long-term, macroeconomic trends, not planning goals set by mayors.
Joel Kotkin
Well... here we go again. Does this guy ever have anything new to say...?