City Plans By Designers, Not Developers
This Times of London opinion piece calls for planners and architects with a true vision to get back in control of city planning. The author argues that "it is the developers who produce the master plans, and the city that responds to them."
Author Magnus Linklater is not too happy with the way British towns are evolving. He recalls the early days of many towns when a few people guided the development of the town and shaped its form with confidence and broad oversight. But now as developers are replacing the planners and architects that used to guide the city form, the author feels that cities desperately need a leader to control design.
"There is a strong case for cities each to have an architect-in-chief, someone with the taste and vision to veto the worst and encourage the best. In reality, however, his powers are always likely to be limited. The days when cities were laid out and designed by powerful men of vision are long gone. We live in the age of the developer, and though a city’s planning department can and does control, modify and even veto the design ideas put forward by commercial organizations, it does not, by and large, dictate them."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related News Stories
Duany Takes On Scotland - Sep 21, 2006
'Fractal' Design Makes More With Less - Sep 21, 2006
Duany In Edinburgh - Jul 25, 2006
Plenty Green But Too Tall? - Nov 10, 2008
Adaptively Reusing Brooklyn's Industrial Spaces - Oct 30, 2008



I've seen too many badly
I've seen too many badly done developments that have "optimised" lot yield with little regard to amenity or aesthetics. The approving authority usually has very few suitably qualified staff to assess the developments from all aspects.
There would be resistance, as the developers would see it as yet another cost they would have to bear.
Urbandesignr