City Plans By Designers, Not Developers

17 August 2006 - 4:00am

This Times of London opinion piece calls for planners and architects with a true vision to get back in control of city planning. The author argues that "it is the developers who produce the master plans, and the city that responds to them."

Sponsored Advertisement
Advertise on Planetizen

Author Magnus Linklater is not too happy with the way British towns are evolving. He recalls the early days of many towns when a few people guided the development of the town and shaped its form with confidence and broad oversight. But now as developers are replacing the planners and architects that used to guide the city form, the author feels that cities desperately need a leader to control design.

"There is a strong case for cities each to have an architect-in-chief, someone with the taste and vision to veto the worst and encourage the best. In reality, however, his powers are always likely to be limited. The days when cities were laid out and designed by powerful men of vision are long gone. We live in the age of the developer, and though a city’s planning department can and does control, modify and even veto the design ideas put forward by commercial organizations, it does not, by and large, dictate them."

Source: Times of London, August 15, 2006

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I've seen too many badly

I've seen too many badly done developments that have "optimised" lot yield with little regard to amenity or aesthetics. The approving authority usually has very few suitably qualified staff to assess the developments from all aspects.

There would be resistance, as the developers would see it as yet another cost they would have to bear.

Urbandesignr