California Fuel Tax Proposal Called Into Question
The proposed measure, which would raise taxes on petrol to fund conservation and alternative energy efforts, is under fire due to benefits it would provide one of its major backers.
In November, Californians will decide on the Proposition 87, the Clean Alternative Energy Act, that would impose a 1.5 percent to 6 percent petroleum tax, depending on the per-barrel price of oil, on in-state oil extraction to fund the research, production and promotion of alternative energies. The tax is expected to raise about $400 million a year.
Vinod Khosla, one of the founders of Sun Microsystems and now a prominent Silicon Valley venture capitalist, could profit handsomely if the measure passes. Mr. Khosla put up more than $1 million in seed money for the alternative fuels measure earlier this year. He is also a big investor in ethanol, an alternative to gasoline and one of the energy sources that could benefit if Proposition 87 passes.
"Just because I could benefit from it, doesn't make it wrong," Khosla said. "This is the right thing to do, for a lot of reasons."
Sacramento Bee political columnist Dan Weintraub discusses the relationship between California's intiatives and their backers - exposing a financial relationship that may call them into question, warning that it "is not a good way to make policy".
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Kotkin Compares California to Iran - Jun 08, 2011
- Initiative Underway To Suspend California's Global Warming Act - Feb 08, 2010
- From Grimy to Green - Apr 29, 2009
- Business Carbon Tax Proposed In San Francisco - Dec 14, 2007
- Global Warming Legislation Could Have A Positive Economic Impact - Aug 22, 2006


















