Is The Cul-De-Sac An Endangered Species?
1 August 2006 - 10:00am
More cities are calling for an end to dead ends, to the dismay of residents and developers.
Which way for cul-de-sacs? Planners see them as hindering street connectivity, but residents say they promote social connections. Developers find them to be an added value for home sales – one survey found that one in four home buyers say they would spend more for a home on a cul-de-sac. But what about the claims that the dead ends add to traffic congestion and increase road maintenance costs?
Source:
The Seattle Times, July 29, 2006
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- With Land at a Premium, Fire Poles are Back - Oct 10, 2011
- Mixed-Use Prevails in 2030 Land Use Projections - Sep 08, 2011
- Preserving Business During Construction Clutter - Aug 05, 2010
- Seattle's Backyard Cottages Encouraged - May 28, 2010
- Mall of America Weathering Recession Surprisingly Well - Mar 04, 2010
“
These interconnections ratify for us the sense that markets are as strong as confidence is present and confidence is as justified as patterns are dependable. These are what might be called our community moorings: anchored, tangible patterns.
”


















My Opinion
At this point, I dont think cul-de-sacs are endangered, in fact, i think they are developing full steam ahead. As much as I would like to see these suburban disasters eradicated, its only a dream right now. Unless more people realize there is no gain in cul-de-sac living, we will continue to see them developed for the suburban lovers out there. There is still in increased demand in the majority of US cities that fuels this ever growing step away from the cities of pre-war stature.
NAUTF | North American Urban Transit Forum
Cul-de-sacs are rad!
I think there are more important factors contributing to social contacts in a neighborhood with a cul-de-sac than casual meetings on the sidewalk. I grew up in such a neighborhood and I was friends with kids from two of the five houses on the cul-de-sac. They, in turn, were friends with other kids in the neighborhood. Existing social networks played a large role in determining who we knew. If the next-door neighbor who walked over and welcomed us had a kid my age, that was how I made my first friend. That friend would then introduce me to other kids. School was also important, especially if my classmates lived in my neighborhood and walked or rode the bus to school with me. Where we lived on the block (it was actually a circle with one cul-de-sac leading off of it and access streets on two sides) was not nearly as important as these existing networks. For my parents (perhaps the more relevant perspective here), social interaction with other adults mostly centered around us kids, i.e. they sought contact with other parents in the neighborhood so that we would have friends to play with. With a few exceptions (e.g. when some of the neighborhood dads would play basketball at the local elementary school courts), our immediate neighbors (next-door and across the street) were really the only people my parents had significant interaction with. Casual meetings on the sidewalks, whether in the cul-de-sac or on the "circle", were infrequent in my hot and sticky Floridian suburban neighborhood, but this did not hinder social interaction. Granted, it was not Jane Jacobs’ neighborhood, but neither was it a ghost-town. I doubt my friends and their families on the cul-de-sac considered where they lived a "suburban disaster". I sure didn’t...that was one of the best places to skateboard! We could set up our half-pipe there without worrying about too many cars interrupting us.
Brian Salmons
Rogers Park, Chicago, Illinois, USA
feeling lucky
yes, they are such a threat that I feel lucky to have survived growing up on a cul-de-sac...
speaking from personal experience, I really liked growing up on a cul-de-sac. There was rarely any traffic, and I developed strong friendships with people in the neighborhood. That said, I also developed friendships with people *outside* the cul-de-sac as well, so it's hard to understand the social argument against them.
from a planning perspective, it's true: you can design a community with too many cul-de-sacs. Most of us have seen poorly designed communities with too many cul-de-sacs, but there are ways to mitigate the dead-end factor. many cities and developers are leaving ample space within the culdesac for a pedestrian (or even a small greenway) connection to the street beyond.
we should be debating more important things.
walkway
Come to think of it, my neighborhood cul-de-sac had just such a pedestrian walkway. It was just a sidewalk with chainlink fence along both sides, but it connected the cul-de-sac to the road outside of it. It was the main thoroughfare from our neighborhood to the elementary school that sat on that road, and to the lake
nearby. Very convenient.
Brian Salmons
Rogers Park, Chicago, Illinois, USA