Court Rules Against Taking Homes For Economic Development
28 July 2006 - 1:00pm
The Ohio Supreme Court has sided with homeowners in the latest case over property rights.
"Ohio Supreme Court ruled unanimously that economic development isn't a sufficient reason under the state constitution to justify taking homes, putting a halt to a $125 million project of offices, shops and restaurants in a Cincinnati suburb that officials said would create jobs and add tax revenue.
The case was the first challenge of property rights laws to reach a state high court since the U.S. Supreme Court last summer allowed municipalities to seize homes for use by a private developer."
Full Story:
Ohio's High Court Backs Property Owners
Source:
MSN Money, July 26, 2006
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Taking Parking Lots Seriously, as Public Spaces - Jan 07, 2012
- How the Suburbs Killed Our Connectivity, And How to Fix It - Dec 07, 2011
- Does Living in a Poor Neighborhood Harm Your Health? - Nov 19, 2011
- Senate Approves Federal Funding for NJ Rail Tunnel - Nov 15, 2011
- Extreme Makeover: Housing Policies Edition - Aug 28, 2011
“
No matter how one wanted to organize the ideal city, housing security would be part of it. No community can function effectively if large numbers of its residents are regularly displaced or perpetually at risk of being displaced.
”


















