Wanted: Fast Growing Technology Company
16 August 2000 - 12:00am
The booming success of e-commerce and the accompanying revenue it generates for the cities where it locates has made dot.coms the businesses to have in your community.
A particular city's desire to attract or encourage certain businesses or types of economic development is as changeable as a teenager's taste in clothing, and often for the same reason -- envy over what their neighbor has. Because of California's tax limitations and the need for cities to increase general fund revenues, many cities are trying to attract retail sales tax revenues. Most cities used to desire big box retailers or auto dealership centers. Recently, however, this desire has changed. The new chant of job-hungry cities is, "We want technology employees." Unfortunately, some cities must face the harsh reality that just because you want dot.com or technology jobs doesn't mean they want you. All cities and markets are not created equal and the new question for developing cities has become, "How do we attract dot.coms to our community?"
The answer to this question is not always simple. The mere desire to attract e-business will not assure success. Industry has always located itself in close proximity to its necessary raw material and energy. In the e-commerce world, young, highly-educated people are the raw materials that feed dot.com companies. If you are developing a dot.com company, placing your company somewhere near colleges or universities and close to the ocean, recreational opportunities and other young singles is a must. With unemployment falling below four percent, employers are becoming more hard-pressed to provide their raw materials, or workforce, with the comforts they desire.
It's unlikely that a community will attract dot.coms if neighboring communities haven't attracted other dot.coms. We are all aware of the synergy that has developed in Silicon Valley and in Santa Monica where it has become evident that Southern California high tech companies like to locate close to other high tech companies. In addition, with so much of Southern California's high tech world connected to the entertainment industry, locations near the studios are not only in demand, but a necessity.
All of these factors suggest that not all communities will be equal in their success in attracting dot.coms. However, as we have seen in the past, the limited likelihood of success does not necessarily stop the pursuit. Too often, it comes down to, if the neighboring city has e-commerce, we want it, too.
Larry J. Kosmont, CRE, is President/CEO of eCitydeals, a Government-to-Business Internet company that creates a marketplace for local governments to do business online and Founding Partner of Kosmont Partners, a full service real estate and economic development advisory firm. Larry has over 22 years of public and private real estate experience, and has negotiated and managed real estate transactions with a total value exceeding $6 billion.
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
There are currently no posts in this category.
“
It's all too easy for projects to claim that they will be successful places, and all too hard to tell ahead of time which ones actually will.
”



















Dot coms- ebusiness and planning
I fully agree with what you have out there in India, only the difference is here we have a heterogenous mix of conventional and new economy planning, as we need to cope with the exisiting situation. Here planning and e business are still far-off cousins. Although a focus on infrastructure development is realised, I suppose ebusiness would definitely improve the infrastructure status of various cities in India. The need is for urban management.
Dot.com article
Dear Larry: You'd be on to something if you wrote your thesis in 1998 or 1999, but as the dot.com world has matured, we're reading more and more stories about dot.coms going bust left and right. The stock market has punished a good number of former high flyers. DrKoop.com which began with such hoopla is literally bankrupt: 19 cents a share is a definite sign of rigor mortis setting in compared to its previous nose bleed high. From what I read in the business section of the Times and other financial papers, big retailers such as WalMart will use the internet as skillfully as they have used and dominated the bricks and mortar world. Dot.com land use planning only makes sense if the dit.coms make money. So far, a very small percentage have succeeded. If a city throws out the welcome mat for the dot.coms and they go belly up, then such a public policy would be short lived as well. Provoking idea you have but I don't agree. Let the neighboring cities entice the dot.coms - my city will provide the BMW dealers and the upscale restaurants that will pocket big chunks of their fancy salaries.
Too much emphasis on dot-coms
Mr. Kosmont seems to buy into and support the argument that communities need dot-coms. For many communities across the US, this is a fallacy, and leads to a waste of resources. Many communities would be much better served focusing on building industries in which the community has a competitive advantage -- this is good economic development.
Also, the competition among neighboring cities for big-box retailers, arenas, and similar large projects, has led to some of the most wasteful use of public monies. We would all be better served if we took a regional approach to creating regional centers of excellence (whether for technology or for manufacturing), rather than trying to compete with our neighboring cities.