Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance Ruled Unconstitutional In San Diego
Thanks to: Lowell Grattan and Tim Frank via Sierra Club, Loma Prieta chapter, Land Use committee listserv
A judge has ruled the City of San Diego's 10 percent inclusionary zoning ordinance unconstitutional. Building industry officials are pleased, although the decision "could bankrupt the affordable housing fund".
"San Diego's affordable housing law, which requires homebuilders to subsidize affordable housing, is unconstitutional, a judge ruled May 24.
The ruling comes years after the case was filed by the Building Industry Association of San Diego County and just months after the conflict between the city and developers hit a fevered pitch, as a tentative settlement between the council and the builders became unhinged weeks ago.
'This could bankrupt the affordable housing fund,' said Pam Hardy, spokeswoman for Council President Scott Peters. 'Rather than get something, we get nothing.'"
The law being challenged, known as the 'inclusionary zoning ordinance,' requires that 10 percent of a residential developer's project fit be deemed affordable housing. To avoid that benchmark, developers can also pay what's known as the in-lieu fee, a surcharge that is used to construct affordable housing throughout the city.
The judge ruled that the law is unfairly cumbersome to builders, as developers who would be damaged by the law are forced to jump through too many hoops to acquire a waiver."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related News Stories
SF Affordable Housing Measure Defeated - Nov 06, 2008
'Housing That Works' Plan Announced - Oct 16, 2008
Something Good To Say About California's Prop 13 In A Housing Slump - Jul 10, 2008
Caring For Foreclosed Lawns - Jun 08, 2008
Parking Lot Hotels Serve Homeless - May 22, 2008


