The Myth Of Solid Ground, Reviewed
In his recent book, The Myth of Solid Ground, David Ulin looks at what earthquakes might mean, from a cultural standpoint -- including what scientific, or pseudo-scientific, techniques now hope to predict future seismic catastrophe.
"While researching the book, Ulin joked 'that I would either learn enough about earthquakes to stay comfortably in California or so much that I'd have to move away. As it happens, I came to the former conclusion.'
...But the one thing I did find reinforced almost everywhere was the limitation of official science – of pragmatic science – to encompass large theoretical areas. I think there has been a failure of imagination on behalf of seismologists – and geologists in general – in terms of how they approach the subject of earthquakes. That’s probably because of the failure of prediction to pan out in the 1980s, for instance, when prediction was a big thing – they really thought this was going to be possible. Millions of dollars were spent, papers were written, careers were staked – but it failed to pan out. I think they got scared and, basically, retrenched. Earthquake prediction became the kiss of death."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Taking Parking Lots Seriously, as Public Spaces - Jan 07, 2012
- 2012's Big Urban Projects - Jan 02, 2012
- Six Trending Urbanist Themes for the New Year - Dec 31, 2011
- HUD Announces Sustainability Grant Winners - Dec 09, 2011
- How the Suburbs Killed Our Connectivity, And How to Fix It - Dec 07, 2011


















