'The End of Suburbia?' If Only!

15 March 2006 - 7:00am

Energy concerns aside, suburbia has become unsustainable as an environment of debt and economic apartheid, writes John Barber.

"For the sake of suburbanites alone, the end of suburbia would be a blessing. But that's not happening. To the extent we understand suburbia as a single place, wherever it occurs -- an uncomfortably definitive mould, a collection of syndromes masquerading as a lifestyle -- it is all too robust. We made our bed over the past half-century, shaping increasingly homogeneous, car-dependent, overconsuming, overworked, socially exclusive suburbs, and now we must lie in it."

"It may well be that suburbia 'ends' in a great postoil apocalypse. Or it may be brought to crisis by some other aspect of its manifold overconsumption -- of land, for instance. It may be, however, that the suburbia we all love to hate is simply no longer historical, something that will change and perhaps improve in time, but anthropological: a big mistake made permanent."

Source: The Globe and Mail, March 14, 2006
Bookmark and Share
Even if the report overestimates the costs by a factor of two and underestimates the tax-benefit by a similar amount, the conclusion would be pretty much the same: destination resorts cost local government and taxpayers money.